State v. Dieckmann
| Citation | 75 Mo. 570 |
| Parties | THE STATE v. DIECKMANN, Appellant. |
| Decision Date | 30 April 1882 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
affirmed for reasons given by the St. Louis court of appeals. See 11 Mo. App. 538.
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.
AFFIRMED.
M. F. Taylor for appellant.
D. H. McIntyre, Attorney General, and John R. Warfield, Prosecuting Attorney of St. Louis County, for the State.
This case is before us on defendant's appeal from the judgment of the St. Louis court of appeals affirming the judgment of the circuit court of St. Louis county sentencing defendant to imprisonment in the penitentiary for twenty years, he having been tried in said court and found guilty of murder in the second degree for killing Henry W. Mertz. We find the alleged errors relied upon by counsel for reversal of the judgment to be the same relied upon when the cause was before the St. Louis court of appeals, and after having carefully considered them, are entirely satisfied with the correctness of the ruling of said court upon each and all of them, and for the reasons given in the opinion of said court delivered by Thompson, J., hereby affirm the judgment, in which all concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
The State v. Schaefer
... ... 100; State v. Rush, 95 Mo ... 199. (4) Affidavits of counsel, or other persons, of the ... misconduct of the jury, upon information derived from ... particular jurors, will not be heard to impeach the verdict ... Thompson and Merriam on Juries, sec. 445; State v ... Dieckmann, 11 Mo.App. 538; affirmed, S. C., 75 Mo. 570; ... State v. Rush, 95 Mo. 199; State v. Dunn, ... 80 Mo. 681; State v. Cooper, 85 Mo. 256 ... ... OPINION ... [116 ... Mo. 99] Burgess, J ... Upon ... an indictment for murder in ... ...
-
State v. O'Harra
...State v. Branstetter, 65 Mo. 149; State v. Jones, 79 Mo. 441; State v. Starr, 38 Mo. 277; State v. Dieckman, 11 Mo.App. 538; affirmed, 75 Mo. 570; State v. Wilson, 85 Mo. 134; State v. Banks, 73 Mo. 592; State v. Murphy, 14 Mo.App. 73; State v. Cooper, 71 Mo. 436; State v. Tate, 12 Mo.App. ......
-
State v. Rush
...to impeach their own verdict. State v. Branstetter, 65 Mo. 149; State v. Alexander, 66 Mo. 148; State v. Shock, 68 Mo. 552; State v. Dieckmann, 75 Mo. 570; v. Fox, 79 Mo. 109; State v. Dunn, 80 Mo. 681. (b) Testimony as to jurors' declarations, made after the trial, will not be received to ......
-
Meisch v. Sippy
...verdict made by jurors to third persons. State v. Fox, 79 Mo. 109; State v. Dickmann, 11 Mo.App. 538, affirmed by the Supreme Court in 75 Mo. 570; State v. Dunn, 80 681; State v. Branstetter, 65 Mo. 149; Thompson & Merriman on Juries, p. 547, sec. 445; idem, p. 543, sec. 440; Mergargel & Co......