State v. Dixon, 289
Decision Date | 11 April 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 289,289 |
Parties | STATE, v. Osbie Norwood DIXON. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Charles L. Abernethy, Jr., New Bern, for defendant appellant.
T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., and G. A. Jones, Jr., Ass't Atty. Gen., for the State.
The State's evidence shows these facts: About 9:30 o'clock p. m. on 26 May 1961 Sergeant T. M. Martin of the State Highway Patrol drove up behind defendant, who was driving an automobile on West Vernon Avenue toward the city of Kinston. Defendant ran off the shoulder of the street, and pulled back on the street, and ran off the shoulder of the street and back on the street three times. Martin stopped him. Defendant got out of his automobile. He staggered, and said he had been drinking all day. In Martin's opinion, defendant was under the influence of some intoxicating liquor. Martin called Patrolman W. D. Parrish to come, and get defendant.
Defendant said in Parrish's presence: 'He knew he probably had to much to be driving, but didn't think he was drunk.' Parrish found a full pint of whisky in defendant's automobile. In Parrish's opinion, defendant was under the influence of some intoxicating liquor. Defendant said he wanted a blood test, and signed a written application to that effect. Parrish carried defendant to a local hospital that night to have a blood test made.
About ten o'clock p. m. that night David P. Lutz in Lenoir Memorial Hospital took a sample of blood from defendant's body. Lutz testified in respect to his qualifications and training, but not in as full a manner as he did in State v. Hart, N.C., 124 S.E.2d 816, but in the present case he stated this which does not appear in the Hart case: The Court, without objection, held Lutz 'is a medical...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Woody v. Vickrey
-
State v. Webb, 335
...on redirect examination without objection. Substantially identical testimony was held to have been properly admitted in State v. Dixon, 256 N.C. 698, 124 S.E.2d 821; State v. Hart, 256 N.C. 645, 124 S.E.2d 816; State v. Moore, 245 N.C. 158, 95 S.E.2d 548; State v. Willard, supra. The Dixon ......
- Walker v. Walker, 382