State v. Dojnia
Decision Date | 24 September 2019 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Jodi M. DOJNIA |
333 Conn. 914
215 A.3d 1211 (Mem)
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Jodi M. DOJNIA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Decided September 24, 2019
Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, and James P. Sexton, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.
Brett R. Aiello, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 190 Conn. App. 353, 210 A.3d 586 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that General Statutes §§ 1-1f (b) and 53a-60b (a) (1) were not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant?
"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence the state presented at trial was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was ‘physically disabled’ under the governing statutes?"
ROBINSON, C.J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Jodi D.
...to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was ‘physically disabled’ under the governing statutes?" State v. Dojnia , 333 Conn. 914, 215 A.3d 1211 (2019). The defendant also claims on appeal that, even if the statutes are not unconstitutionally vague, § 53a-60b (a) (1) is unconstitu......
-
State v. Rivera
...quotation marks omitted.) State v. Dojnia , 190 Conn. App. 353, 371–72, 210 A.3d 586, cert. granted on other grounds, 333 Conn. 914, 215 A.3d 1211 (2019). Section 53a-181 (a) provides in relevant part: "A person is guilty of breach of the peace in the second degree when, with intent to caus......
- Casablanca v. Casablanca
-
2019 Appellate Review
...Court. [82] 193 Conn. App. at 606-37. [83] 188 Conn. App. 241, 204 A.3d 823 (2019). [84] 189 Conn. App. 812, 209 A.3d 725, cert, denied, 333 Conn. 914, 216 A.3d 650 (2019). This amounted to a pyrrhic victory for the defendant as the Court dismissed his amended appeal as frivolous and remand......