State v. Duffy

Decision Date17 October 1960
Citation33 N.J. 385,164 A.2d 848
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Roy G. DUFFY et al., Defendants-Respondents.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.

See same case below: 62 N.J.Super. 339, 162 A.2d 911.

Brendan T. Byrne and Sanford M. Jaffe, Newark, for petitioner.

Vincent M. Mangino, Orange, and Warren E. Dunn, Newark, for respondents.

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Miller
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • May 24, 1978
    ...thereon by the trial judge. See State v. Bowden, 62 N.J.Super. 339, 349, 162 A.2d 911 (App.Div.) certif. den. sub nom. State v. Duffy, 33 N.J. 385, 164 A.2d 848 (1960)." In transcript quotations hereafter, 'T:' signifies the question or comment from the trooper, and 'D:' signifies defendant......
  • State v. Mirault
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • March 17, 1983
    ...of cash of finance company); State v. Bowden, 62 N.J.Super. 339, 346, 162 A.2d 911 (App.Div.), certif. den. sub nom. State v. Duffy, 33 N.J. 385, 164 A.2d 848 (1960) (bank teller had custody of cash in drawer); State v. Trunfio, 58 N.J.Super. 445, 448, 156 A.2d 486 (App.Div.1959) (common ca......
  • State v. D'Agostino
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • October 20, 1980
    ...component" of robbery. State v. Bowden, 62 N.J.Super., 339, 345, 162 A.2d 911 (App.Div. 1960), certif. den. sub nom. State v. Duffy, 33 N.J. 385, 164 A.2d 848 (1960); State v. McDonald, 89 N.J.L. 421, 422-423, 99 A. 128 (Sup.Ct. 1916), aff'd 91 N.J.L. 233, 103 A. 165 (E. & A. Thus, in Fishe......
  • State v. Fauntleroy
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 22, 1962
    ...N.J. 453, 122 A.2d 639 (1956) and State v. Bowden, 62 N.J.Super. 339, 162 A.2d 911 (App.Div.1960), certif. denied, United States v. Duffy, 33 N.J. 385, 164 A.2d 848 (1960), where the confessions were excluded upon a showing that they had been induced by violence. In State v. Pierce, supra, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT