State v. Dupuy
Citation | 11 S.W. 964,52 Ark. 48 |
Parties | STATE v. DUPUY |
Decision Date | 22 June 1889 |
Court | Supreme Court of Arkansas |
APPEAL from Lee Circuit Court, M. T. SANDERS, Judge.
Judgment affirmed.
1. Deeds are to be construed so as to render them operative, if possible. 6 Ark. 109. Every instrument intended (as was this) as security for a debt, although absolute on its face, will be construed to be intended as a mortgage, and parol testimony is admissible to establish the fact. 5 Ark. 321; 7 id., 505; 13 id., 112; 18 id., 34; 15 id., 284.
Wherever there is a debt and a conveyance to secure same, the policy of the law is to constitute it a mortgage. 2 Story Com., 287.
The instrument was a mortgage or deed of trust in the nature of a mortgage. It had none of the elements of an assignment. 4 N.Y. 211; 21 N.Y. 131; 31 Ark. 429.
E. D Robertson, for appellee.
37 Ark 151, and 39 Ark. 66, are conclusive of this case. See 1 F. 768.
Suit by appellant against Sheriff and his bondsmen, for damages alleged to have been sustained in the seizure of certain goods by the Sheriff.
The only question was as to the character of an instrument of conveyance from one Foster to West.
Assignment:
For benefit of creditors: Instrument constituting.
The deed executed by Foster to West recited the parties, being Thomas Foster of the one part, N. Straub and Henry Lohman and D. C. Smith of the second part, and P. C. West, as trustee for said Straub & Lohman, and D. C. Smith of the third part; described the debt due to Straub individually, the debt due to the firm of Straub & Lohman, and the debt due to Smith; the desire of Foster to secure the payment of the same and then conveyed in consideration of ten dollars then received, to said West, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Marquese v. Felsenthal
...instrument must be declared a mortgage; if the latter, an assignment." To the same effect the law is laid down by Judge Sandels in State v. Dupuy, 52 Ark. 48, and Fecheimer v. Robertson, 53 Ark. 101, 13 S.W. 423. If there are some expressions in Richmond v. Mississippi Mills, 52 Ark. 30, 11......
-
H.B. Claflin Co. v. Middlesex Banking Co.
... ... good on its face, and shows a strict compliance with all the ... requirements of the mortgage and the laws of the state. It is ... further charged that on January 10, 1896, the banking company ... sold and conveyed these lands by proper deed of conveyance to ... its ... assigned estate. Bartlett v. Teah (C.C.) 1 Fed. 768; ... Teah v. Roth, 39 Ark. 66; State v. Dupuy, ... 52 Ark. 48, 11 S.W. 964. Yet a trust having been established ... by the conveyance to him, a court of equity will not let it ... fail, and ... ...
-
Riggan v. Wolf & Bro
...sec. 23. 5. The transactions of November 29, 1888, constitute an assignment. Burrill, Ass. (3d ed.), 6; 52 Ark. 30; 31 Ark. 437; 8 Iowa 96; 52 Ark. 48; 1 F. W. S. McCain and J. H. Crawford for appellees. 1. The finding of the court below is entitled to the same weight as the verdict of a ju......
-
Brown v. Wilkes
... ... creditors. Turner v. Watkins, 31 Ark. 429; ... Richmond v. Mississippi Mills, 52 Ark. 30, ... 11 S.W. 960; State v. Dupuy, 52 Ark. 48, 11 ... S.W. 964; Fecheimer v. Robertson, 53 Ark ... 101, 13 S.W. 423 ... The ... deed of assignment is, ... ...