State v. Echemeque, 86-2354

Decision Date17 March 1987
Docket NumberNo. 86-2354,86-2354
Citation503 So.2d 996,12 Fla. L. Weekly 776
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 776 The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lazara ECHEMEQUE, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, for appellee.

Before DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of allowing it to enter a written statement explaining its reasons for departing below the sentencing guidelines in sentencing the defendant. Our relinquishment having expired, and no written order having been entered, the defendant's sentence is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). We remind the trial court that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) requires that "[a]ny sentence outside of the guidelines must be accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure." We trust that should the trial court upon resentencing again depart from the guidelines, it will comply with the requirements of this rule.

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. Lemon, 87-1334
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 29, 1987
    ...has stated that notations on a scoresheet do not constitute a sufficient writing as required by rule and statute. State v. Echemeque, 503 So.2d 996 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Echevarria v. State, 492 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Bauza v. State, 491 So.2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Mortimer v. State......
  • Johnson v. State, 87-715
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 1988
    ...requirement, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11). See, e.g., State v. Lemon, 517 So.2d 117, 117 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); State v. Echemeque, 503 So.2d 996 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Echevarria v. State, 492 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Bauza v. State, 491 So.2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Mortimer v. State, ......
  • Singer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 86-405
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 17, 1987

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT