State v. Elmore, 2004-0041.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Ohio
Citation814 NE 2d 488,103 Ohio St.3d 1423
Decision Date01 September 2004
PartiesSTATE v. ELMORE.
Docket Number2004-0041.

103 Ohio St.3d 1423
2004-Ohio-4524
814 NE 2d 488

2004-Ohio-4524

STATE
v.
ELMORE.

2004-0041.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

September 1, 2004.


This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Licking County. Upon consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file supplemental Proposition of Law 17 instanter,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be stayed until further notice.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • State v. Elmore, 2005 Ohio 5940 (OH 11/3/2005), Case No. 2005-CA-32.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • November 3, 2005
    ...and sentenced appellant to death. Appellant appealed his conviction and sentences to the Ohio Supreme Court. (See State v. Elmore 103 Ohio St. 3d 1423, 814 N.E. 2d 488, 2004-Ohio-4524). Neither party has sought a stay of the direct appeal in the Ohio Supreme Court or in the appeal from the ......
  • State v. Thomas, 2004-0900.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • August 31, 2005
    ...robbery under R.C. 2911.02?" {¶ 7} The cause is now before this court upon our determination that a conflict exists. State v. Thomas, 103 Ohio St.3d 1423, 2004-Ohio-4524, 814 N.E.2d {¶ 8} R.C. 2911.02, the robbery statute, provides: {¶ 9} "(A) No person, in attempting or committing a theft ......
2 cases
  • State v. Elmore, 2005 Ohio 5940 (OH 11/3/2005), Case No. 2005-CA-32.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • November 3, 2005
    ...and sentenced appellant to death. Appellant appealed his conviction and sentences to the Ohio Supreme Court. (See State v. Elmore 103 Ohio St. 3d 1423, 814 N.E. 2d 488, 2004-Ohio-4524). Neither party has sought a stay of the direct appeal in the Ohio Supreme Court or in the appeal from the ......
  • State v. Thomas, No. 2004-0900.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • August 31, 2005
    ...under R.C. 2911.02?" {¶ 7} The cause is now before this court upon our determination that a conflict exists. State v. Thomas, 103 Ohio St.3d 1423, 2004-Ohio-4524, 814 N.E.2d {¶ 8} R.C. 2911.02, the robbery statute, provides: {¶ 9} "(A) No person, in attempting or committing a thef......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT