State v. Equitable Loan & Investment Co.

Decision Date29 June 1897
Citation41 S.W. 916,142 Mo. 325
CourtMissouri Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE ex rel. WALKER, Attorney General, v. EQUITABLE LOAN & INVESTMENT CO. OF SEDALIA.

In banc. Original proceeding in quo warranto by the state of Missouri on the information of R. F. Walker, attorney general, against the Equitable Loan & Investment Company to forfeit the company's franchise on the ground of misuser. Defendant demurs to the information. Demurrer overruled.

To the information filed in this cause a demurrer has been interposed, which ne essitates copying the information, which is as follows: "Now comes R. F. Walker, for the state of Missouri, and states that the defendant was created and organized as a building and loan association on the 19th day of July, 1887, under and in accordance with an act of the general assembly of the state of Missouri entitled `An act concerning mutual savings fund loan and building associations,' approved March 31, 1887, and ever since and now is exercising the franchises, rights, and privileges conferred by said act of the legislature of the state of Missouri, and other acts amendatory and supplemental thereto, and having its chief office and place of business in the city of Sedalia, in the county of Pettis, in said state. And this relator charges that ever since its organization it has continuously within this state, and at the county of Pettis, aforesaid, offended against the laws of this state, and has grossly abused and misused its corporate authority, franchises, and privileges, and unlawfully assumed and usurped franchises and privileges not granted to it by the laws of the state of Missouri, and especially in the following particulars, to wit: (1) That the defendant association has issued what it terms `full-paid stock' in shares of the par value of two hundred dollars ($200.00) each, and by which the defendant association, in its certificates issued for said stock, certifies that ____, the party to whom said stock was issued, was entitled to one or more shares of the capital stock of defendant association upon which there has been paid in the full sum of two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each share, the said sum being the dues in full on said shares of stock at the rate of one dollar ($1.00) per month on each share for the full period of two hundred (200) months from its date, and that the holder and owner of said shares of stock was entitled to the redemption thereof in the full sum of two hundred dollars ($200.00) on, and not before, the expiration of one hundred (100) months from the date of its issue, and also to receive thereon as the share of the earnings and profits of the business of said association belonging to the said shares of stock so issued seven per cent. interest per annum, payable in the sum of seven dollars ($7.00) each six months during the whole period of one hundred (100) months, except that the last payment of interest is two-thirds of said sum for four (4) months, said interest being payable agreeably to and only on the presentation and delivery at the place of payment included therein of the coupons attached to said certificates of stock as they respectively matured, and the said association guarantied to secure the redemption of said shares and the payment of the sum of two hundred dollars ($200.00) on each and all the said coupons attached thereto. That there was deposited with the trustee named in said certificates certain securities for the redemption thereof, as hereinafter set forth, and the said certificates further provided that, in consideration of the security thus given for the redemption of said stock, the holder thereof released all right, interest, and benefit to such share in and to the earnings and profits of said association over and above the seven per cent. interest per annum payable as therein provided, and in said certificates declaring that the same was not negotiable until the certificates indorsed on the back thereof had been duly signed by said trustee, and upon the back of each of the said certificates of stock was the indorsement of the said trustee that each of said certificates was secured by the deposit of evidences of indebtedness as stated in the face of said certificates of stock, which were held as security for the redemption of said shares. That each of said certificates of stock was issued as aforesaid by defendant association, and it declared that, to secure the redemption and payment thereof, and all the interest coupons attached thereto, as well as other shares of stock and coupons of the same series, there was deposited with James C. Thompson, as trustee, obligations for loans due said association in an amount ten per cent. more than the total par value of all of the shares in said series, and secured by pledges of the stock of said association with said loans, and also by deeds of trust on real estate, appraised at double the amount of said loans, and with approved titles, and which said deeds of trust and pledged stock were also deposited with the said trustee; and that the defendant association agreed and guarantied that the securities deposited with said trustee should, during the whole of the said one hundred (100) months, be maintained in the amount and character as aforesaid to secure the redemption and payment of said shares of stock, and that the said trustee would hold the said obligations and securities aforesaid for the benefit of the lawful holder of said shares of said series, and that the said trustee was authorized to collect said obligations and indebtedness, or to sell the same, and to use the proceeds thereof to redeem said shares in case default should be made by the defendant association in the redemption and payment thereof or of the interest thereon. And this relator further states that said defendant association has continuously since the time of its organization issued a large number of shares of its full-paid stock as aforesaid, said shares being negotiated and sold upon the faith of the securities deposited with the trustee, as in the said certificates stated, and as shown by the indorsement of the said trustee placed thereon, and signed by him; and that the said defendant association withdrew and took out of its assets its bills receivable to an amount exceeding the amount of its said outstanding shares of stock at least ten per cent., and deposited the same with the said trustee as security for the payment of said shares of stock, and for the payment of the interest thereon; and upon the faith of said certificates and of the deposit of security as aforesaid the defendant association has sold and has now outstanding of said shares of full-paid stock one hundred and eighty-eight thousand dollars ($188,000.00), or more, together with the notes and obligations and assets of the defendant association as security therefor as aforesaid. (2) And this relator further states that there was organized under the laws of the state of Missouri a certain corporation known as `The Pettis County Investment Company,' having a capital stock of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00), and its chief place of business in the city of Sedalia aforesaid, and that by virtue of certain acts of the general assembly of the state of Missouri it became and was necessary for the said Pettis County Investment Company to deposit with the state treasurer of the state of Missouri one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) of good and available securities or cash, to be approved by said treasurer, for the protection of the investors in such bonds, certificates, or debentures as might or should be issued by the said investment company; and thereupon the defendant association, without consideration, issued and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
42 cases
  • State v. Arkansas Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 24 Diciembre 1913
    ... ... It is due to the trade. If the prices are not legitimate and equitable, let them stand up and say so now. There is no use in entering into this thing in a half-hearted ... Walker v. Equitable Loan Association, 142 Mo. 325, 41 S. W. 916. Whether originally there was in the minds of the makers of ... ...
  • State v. Duncan
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 2 Abril 1915
    ... ... State ex rel. v. Rose, 84 Mo. 198; State ex rel. v. Loan Association, 142 Mo. 325, 41 S. W. 916 ...         So also the practice is to style him ... ...
  • State v. Standard Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 23 Diciembre 1908
    ... ... Is now engaged in real estate, fire insurance, loans, and investment, business in that city, as a member of firm of Pratt & Thompson, and has been in that business for ... As said by Judge Sherwood, in the case of State ex inf. v. Equitable Loan & Investment Co., 142 Mo. 325, loc. cit. 337, 41 S. W. 916, 918: `And the jurisdiction of the ... ...
  • State ex Inf. McKittrick v. Wymore
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 28 Septiembre 1938
    ... ... 477, 30 S.W. 158; State ex inf. v. Vallins, 140 Mo. 523, 41 S.W. 887; State ex inf. v. Equitable Loan & Inv. Co., 142 Mo. 325, 41 S.W. 916. (4) This court possesses the inherent common law power ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT