State v. Fabian, 152
Decision Date | 20 November 1957 |
Docket Number | No. 152,152 |
Citation | 97 So.2d 178 |
Parties | STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. George FABIAN, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., Jos. P. Manners and Richard J. Brooks, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellant.
Branch & Goff, Talton A. Branch, Tampa, for appellee.
This is an appeal from an order of the Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Hillsborough County, quashing an information which charged George Fabian with perjury. The State appeals, the parties being referred to herein as they stood before the trial court.
The information filed in the cause below read as follows:
'In The Criminal Court of Record of The County of Hillsborough and State of Florida.
'The 6th day of July, June Term, 1956.
'The State of Florida
v.
George Fabian
'In the Name and By The Authority of The State of Florida:
'That he, the said defendant, George Fabian, prior to his arrest for the said lottery law violations, and on or about November 1, 1955, had a definite understanding with Rudolph Mora for said defendant to rent from Rudolph and Matilda Mora the premises located at 1860 Twenty-fourth Avenue, Tampa, Florida, which was then and there being occupied as a home by the said Rudolph and Matilda Mora; that he, the said George Fabian, was to use the said premises during the day time and was to pay the said Rudolph and Matilda Mora the sum of Twenty Dollars ($20) per week for the use thereof;
'Whereas, in truth and in fact the said defendant, George Fabian did not on said date or at any time have a definite understanding or, in fact, any understanding with the said Rudolph and Matilda Mora or either of them to rent or use said premises located at 1860 Twenty-fourth Avenue, Tampa, Florida, as aforesaid;
The defendant filed a motion to quash on the ground, among several others, that the information...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bazarte v. State
...then and there knowing that he swore falsely.' (Emphasis supplied.) This form of information has been upheld by this court in State v. Fabian, 97 So.2d 178, 181, in which Judge Allen, after reviewing the law in regard thereto, 'We are of the opinion that the information conformed in substan......
-
Shifrin v. State
...matters at issue. See Ritter v. Sinclair, 154 Fla. 272, 17 So.2d 97 (1944); Bazarte v. State, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 227; State v. Fabian, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 178. We have previously affirmed the judgment and sentence appealed herein and there has been no valid reason shown to recede Th......