State v. Faudi
Decision Date | 18 December 1928 |
Docket Number | No. 29084.,29084. |
Citation | 11 S.W.2d 1014 |
Parties | STATE v. FAUDI. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Erwin G. Ossing, Judge.
George Faudi was convicted of robbery with force and arms, and he appeals. Affirmed.
The indictment was as follows:
The verdict was as follows:
"We, the jury in the above entitled cause, find the defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree, as charged in the indictment, and assess the punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for (50) years."
Verne Lacy and Joseph Linder, both of St. Louis, for appellant.
Stratton Shartel, Atty Gen., and Mary Louise Ramsey, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
An indictment filed in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis charged defendant with robbery with force and arms. Upon a trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty, and assessed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 50 years. The defendant appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict.
The evidence warrants the finding that, on January 29, 1927, one Albert Buchmueller was conducting a cleaning and dyeing business at 3444 Gravois avenue in the city of St. Louis. Around 5 p. m. of that day, while Buchmueller, his wife, and a janitress were in the place of business, two men, whom Buchmueller surmised were customers, came in the door, one of whom preceded the other and demanded of Buchmueller money, after covering Buchmueller, his wife, and the janitress with revolvers and ordering them to put up their hands. Buchmueller at their order opened the safe and the till and handed the robber in front, in all, about $120. During the progress of the robbery both men kept revolvers in their hands. On the trial Buchmueller failed to identify defendant as one of the men present during the robbery, but Mrs. Buchmueller and the janitress made a positive identification, saying they particularly noticed the faces of the two men and could not be mistaken as to the identity of defendant. Other testimony tended to...
To continue reading
Request your trial