State v. Fellows

Decision Date31 January 1805
Citation3 N.C. 340
PartiesSTATE v. FELLOWS.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

The owner of the property is not a competent witness in an indictment for forcible trespass and an indictment found on his testimony must be quashed.

Taylor, Judge. The person who is to be entitled to a restitution of possession, in case of a conviction on an indictment of forcible entry, cannot be a witness on the trial; and if the indictment has been found on his single testimony, it ought to be quashed.

And this indictment was quashed for that cause, though there was other testimony now ready to support it.

Cited. State v. Ivey, 100 N. C., 541.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • McKinney v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 22 Julio 1912
    ...People v. Restenblatt, 1 Abb.Prac. (N.Y.) 268, 271, 272; Royce v. Territory, 5 Okl. 61, 47 P. 1083; State v. Cain, 8 N.C. 352; State v. Fellows, 3 N.C. 340; People v. (O. & T.) 14 N.Y.Supp. 642; People v. Brickner (O. & T.) 15 N.Y.Supp. 528, 529; People v. Briggs, 60 How.Prac. (N.Y.) 17, 29......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT