State v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Decision Date | 07 May 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 23239.,23239. |
Citation | 82 S.W.2d 123 |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Parties | STATE ex rel. RICHARDS et al. v. FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; Edmund L. Alford, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Action by the State of Missouri, on the relation of John L. Richards, trustee of the estate of George E. Gullion, deceased, and others, against the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. Judgment for defendant, and relators appeal.
Affirmed.
E. W. Nelson and Harry Carstarphen, both of Hannibal, for appellants.
George A. Hodgman, of St. Louis, and Mahan, Mahan & Fuller, of Hannibal, for respondent.
SUTTON Commissioner.
This is an action on a surety bond in the sum of $2,000 executed by Elijah D. Gullion, now deceased, as principal, and the defendant, the Fidelity & Casualty Company, as surety.
The trial before the court, without a jury, resulted in a finding and judgment for defendant, and relators appeal.
The will of George E. Gullion, deceased, executed on November 7, 1921, and admitted to probate by the probate court of Marion county, Mo., on December 15, 1924, after directing the payment of his debts, disposes of his property as follows:
Elijah D. Gullion qualified as executor under the will, on December 15, 1924, and took charge of the estate of the deceased as such executor. He filed a settlement with the probate court on August 4, 1925, another on February 13, 1926, and another on February 8, 1927, which settlements were approved by the court. The settlement of February 8, 1927, shows a balance due the estate of $1,641.94.
It appears that George E. Gullion owned a farm in Marion county. The record does not show the value of the farm. The settlements filed by the executor indicate that the farm was mortgaged for $4,000. It seems that there was some sort of partnership arrangement between George E. Gullion and Ira Taylor in carrying on farming operations on this farm.
In October, 1927, a suit was instituted in the circuit court of Marion county, styled Elijah D. Gullion, Administrator of the Estate of George E. Gullion, Deceased, v. Ira Taylor, and numbered 7791. The petition in that suit is, in substance, as follows: "Plaintiff alleges that he is the duly appointed and qualified administrator of George E. Gullion, who died December 6, 1924, and that as such administrator plaintiff has been dully authorized, empowered, and directed by the Probate Court to enforce the rights and claims herein asserted; that on November 4, 1921, George E. Gullion was the owner of personal property on his farm and defendant, Ira Taylor, was tenant, to which tenant on said date George E. Gullion sold a one-half interest in the personal property thereon, including live stock and farm equipment, and that said Taylor paid therefor by his promissory note for $4,497.87, secured by a chattel mortgage on the property sold; that defendant Taylor paid $1200 on said note; that a lien exists on defendant Taylor's interest in said property in favor of George E. Gullion for the balance due on said note, and that the property cannot be divided in kind; wherefore plaintiff prays that partition be decreed and that the property be sold and the proceeds of such sale be partitioned between the plaintiff and defendant according to their respective rights and as warranted in the premises; and plaintiff further prays that a receiver be appointed to hold and have charge of said property, to collect and preserve the same, and to dispose of the same at the best market price obtainable, or to hold the same subject to the orders of the court for the sale and disposition thereof and to hold the same until otherwise ordered by the court, and that defendant Taylor be restrained and enjoined from selling or disposing of said property, and that the court order and cause to be made an accounting between the parties with respect to said property, and that defendant Taylor be required to account for the sale and disposition of the proceeds arising from the property heretofore sold and disposed of by said defendant Taylor and belonging to said parties."
Clarence Bender, then sheriff of Marion county, was appointed as receiver by the court to take charge of and sell the property involved in said suit. The receiver, under an order of the court, sold the property, realizing on such sale $2,156.91, and on April 6, 1928, made report of such sale to the court, showing the amount realized and the expenses incurred. After payment of the expenses, costs, and allowances, aggregating $325.80, there remained in the hands of the receiver $1,831.11.
On May 23, 1928, the court approved the report of the receiver, and ordered him to pay over the said sum of $1,831.11 "to the plaintiff E. D. Gullion, administrator of the estate of George E. Gullion, deceased." On July 2, 1928, the receiver filed his report showing that he had, pursuant to said order of the court, paid to "E. D. Gullion, administrator, $1,831.11."
There was testimony on behalf of appellants to the effect that some time prior to the payment of said sum of $1,831.11 by the receiver to E. D. Gullion, Nettie Brunk, Mary Brunk, and Leah Bowles gave receipts to E. D. Gullion, as executor, for the amounts of their legacies under the will of George E. Gullion. The receipts were not put in evidence. They could not be found. It is conceded that there was nothing paid for them.
The evidence also shows that prior to the payment of the money realized from the sale of the property by the receiver in said case of E. D. Gullion, Administrator, v. Ira Taylor, Zona Gullion and Zelma Gullion, children of George E. Gullion, deceased, and legatees under his will, through their mother as their natural guardian, instituted in the circuit court of Marion county a proceeding to require said Elijah D. Gullion to give bond as trustee under said will, said proceeding being styled, "In the Matter of the Trust Estate Created under the Will of George E. Gullion, Deceased," and numbered 7870. On July 2, 1928, the court made an order in said proceeding substantially as follows: "It appears to the court that the mother and natural guardian of Zona Gullion and Zelma Gullion, children of George E. Gullion, deceased, requests that said Elijah D. Gullion give bond as trustee under the will of George E. Gullion, deceased, for the faithful performance and due discharge of his duties as such trustee under said will, and said trustee consenting thereto, said trustee is ordered and directed to give and file in this court a bond in the sum of $2,000 as such trustee for the faithful performance and due discharge of his duties as such trustee, said bond to be approved by this court or the clerk thereof if filed during vacation of this court."
Thereupon, on the same day, the bond in suit, conditioned as required by said order, was made, filed, and approved.
There was testimony on behalf of the appellants that there was an understanding between the attorneys for the guardian of Zona and Zelma Gullion, and the receiver, that the money ordered paid over to Gullion, in the case of Gullion, Administrator, v. Taylor, should not be paid over to him until a bond was given by him, and that the money was not paid over to him until the bond in suit was given.
Respondent put in evidence, over the objection of the appellants, what purports to be a settlement in the probate court, made by Elijah D. Gullion, as executor of the estate of George E. Gullion, deceased. The settlement was sworn to before the clerk of the probate court on February 6, 1929. It was not marked filed, nor does it appear that it was approved...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jackson's Will, In re
...51 Mo. 282.22 In re Schield's Estate, Mo.Sup., 250 S.W.2d 151; West v. Bailey, 196 Mo. 517, 94 S.W. 273; State ex rel. Richards v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., Mo.App., 82 S.W.2d 123.23 Estey v. Commerce Trust Co., 333 Mo. 977, 64 S.W.2d 608; Bolles v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis, 363 ......
-
Cartall v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
... ... 207; ... McBride v. Bank & Trust Co., 330 Mo. 259; First ... State Bank v. Braden, 39 S.D. 53; Peck v. Peck, ... 137 P. 137; Natl. Match ... 668; Williams v ... Reid, 37 S.W.2d 537; State v. Fidelity & Cas ... Co., 82 S.W.2d 123; McWilliams v. Ramsey, 23 ... Ala. 813; ... ...
-
Richards v. Earls
... ... Drainage District is a municipal corporation. State ex ... rel. v. Little River Drainage Dist., 269 Mo. 444, 190 ... S.W ... 504, 50 Am. Rep. 510; ... State ex rel. Richards v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. (Mo ... App.), 82 S.W.2d 123, 128.] ... ...
-
Eliason v. Production Credit Association of Aitkin
...Hindman, 86 Ore. 545, 169 P. 93, 1 A.L.R. 1476; Briscoe v. Merchants & Miners Bank, Mo.App., 102 S.W.2d 751; State ex rel. Richards v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., Mo.App., 82 S.W.2d 123; New York Cent. R. Co. v. General Motors Corp., D.C.N.D.Ohio, 182 F.Supp. 273.13 State ex rel. Richards v. Fidel......