State v. Fisher, 518P06.

Decision Date25 January 2007
Docket NumberNo. 518P06.,518P06.
Citation642 S.E.2d 711
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Rodney Michael FISHER.
ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of September 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON recused.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Nicholson, No. COA08-1007 (N.C. App. 6/16/2009)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 16 Junio 2009
    ...453 S.E.2d 165-66 (1995). In making this determination, courts consider the totality of the circumstances. State v. Fisher, 171 N.C. App. 201, 209, 614 S.E.2d 428, 433 (2005), cert. denied, 361 N.C. 223, 642 S.E.2d 711 Based on its findings of fact, the trial court concluded: One, that the ......
  • Commonwealth v. Silvester
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 2 Mayo 2016
    ...their character, from what they proceed, and the direction from which they seem to come”). See also, e.g., State v. Fisher, 171 N.C.App. 201, 214, 614 S.E.2d 428 (2005), cert. denied, 361 N.C. 223, 642 S.E.2d 711 (2007). Our decision, however, rests on other grounds.We are satisfied that, e......
  • State v. Cannady, No. COA07-274 (N.C. App. 12/18/2007)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 18 Diciembre 2007
    ...never objected to the admission of his confession at trial, he did not properly preserve the issue forappeal. State v. Fisher, 171 N.C. App. 201, 614 S.E.2d 428 (2005), cert. denied, 361 N.C. 223, 642 S.E.2d 711 (2007). Furthermore, although Defendant could have assigned plain error to the ......
  • State v. Staton, No. COA06-1009 (N.C. App. 7/17/2007)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 17 Julio 2007
    ...A prerequisite to plain error analysis is the determination that the trial court's action constituted error. State v. Fisher, 171 N.C. App. 201, 212-13, 614 S.E.2d 428, 436 (2005), cert. denied, 361 N.C. 223, 642 S.E.2d 711 (2007). Our Supreme Court has held that "it is not error for the tr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT