State v. Flowers

Decision Date31 January 1813
Citation6 N.C. 225
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE v. FLOWERS & HAMPTON.
From Chatham.

A negro slave in the possession of and claimed by B goes on the land of C, and is there taken possession of by G in the absence of B, who shortly thereafter pursues 0 and attempts to take the slave from him. C is at liberty to repel this attempt, and is not indictable if he uses only such force as is necessary to retain the possession of the slave, nor is he indictable for the trespass in taking the slave, as the taking was on his own land, without any force or violence to B.

THE defendant was indicted for a trespass. The jury found them guilty subject to the opinion of the court on the following case:

"On 16 November, 1810, a negro woman, the property of Wright Kirby, had taken some clothes to wash at a creek running through the land of the defendant, Green Flowers. The place where she went to wash was distant from the house of Kirby about a quarter of a mile, and within the lines and on the land of the defendant Flowers. In the evening a negro girl named Nan, then in possession of Wright Kirby, was sent by Mrs. Kirby to assist in bringing up the clothesfrom the place where they were washed; and whilst she was there the defendants Flowers and Hampton came up, and Flowers, assisted by Hampton, took the negro girl Nan into his possession (Mrs. Kirby being then at her house) and carried her some distance towards his house contrary to the will of the said Nan. While Nan was so in the possession of Flowers, and while he was on his own land and within his own inclosures, and after he had carried her nearly three hundred yards, Mrs.

Kirby overtook them and attempted to take the said Nan from the defendant, who prevented her from so doing. In making these attempts, Mrs. Kirby was once or twice pushed down by defendants, and bruised, but she was not struck, nor was any offer made to strike her; no force was used towards her except in preventing her from taking the negro girl Nan from the defendants.

Upon these facts the jury prayed the advice of the court, whether the defendants were guilty of an indictable trespass, and the case was sent to this Court.

LOCKE, J. The principle has long been settled, that an indictment for a trespass in taking property can be supported only in those instances where the act of taking has been accompanied with force, or where it is done manu forti. The evidence disclosed to support this indictment states that the negro charged to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Baker
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1949
    ... ... ' G.S. s 14-134 ...          Various ... criminal trespasses to land and fixtures are known to the ... law. Some are common law crimes, and others are legislative ... creations. State v. Phipps, 32 N.C. 17; State v ... Love, 19 N.C. 267; State v. Flowers, 6 N.C ... 225; State v. Trexler, 4 N.C. 188, 6 Am.Dec. 558; ... G.S.Ch. 14, art. 22. They fall into three classifications ... when tested by their social objectives ...           Some, ... e. g., the crime of unlawfully cutting, injuring or removing ... another's timber as defined ... ...
  • State v. Lawson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1898
    ...v. Armfield, 27 N. C. 207. Such demonstration of force may be a 'multitude' or by weapons. State v. Ray, 32 N. C. 29, citing State v. Flowers, 6 N. C. 225; State v. Mills, 13 N. C. 555." It was not necessary that the prosecutor should be present at the very moment of entry. He could not be ......
  • State v. Davis
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 24, 1891
    ...v. Arm field, 27 N. C. 207. Such demonstration of force may be by a "multitude, " or by weapons. State v. Ray, 32 N. C. 39, citing State v. Flowers, 6 N.C. 225; State v. Mills, 13 N.C. 420. The statute (Code, § 1028) provides: "No one shall make entry into any lands and tenements or term fo......
  • Hunt v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1907
    ... ... Duke, ... 82 Mo.App. 55; Frank v. Railroad, 57 Mo.App. 186; ... Deweese v. Mining Co., 54 Mo.App. 488; Baker v ... Railroad, 122 Mo. 596; State v. Cable, 117 Mo ... 386; Stevenson v. Handcock, 72 Mo. 612; Redpath ... v. Railroad, 42 Mo.App. 112; Stone v. Hunt, 94 ... Mo. 475; Frederick v ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT