State v. Foster, CR-04-0500.
| Decision Date | 23 December 2005 |
| Docket Number | CR-04-0500. |
| Citation | 935 So.2d 1216 |
| Parties | STATE v. Lakisha FOSTER. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Troy King, atty. gen., and J. Thomas Leverette, asst. atty. gen., for appellant.
Thomas Fields, Montgomery; and Jacqueline Mixon, Montgomery, for appellee.
This is a pretrial appeal by the State of Alabama pursuant to Rule 15.7, Ala. R.Crim. P., from an order of the Montgomery Circuit Court granting the motion of the appellee, Lakisha Foster, to dismiss her indictment. Foster was charged in a three-count indictment with first-degree criminal mischief, harassment, and third-degree criminal trespass. Her codefendant and husband, Frederick Foster, was tried and found guilty of second-degree criminal mischief and third-degree criminal trespass. At the conclusion of Frederick Foster's trial, Lakisha Foster made an oral motion to dismiss her indictment, which Judge Johnny Hardwick granted on December 1, 2004. The order granting her motion reads, in relevant part:
Rule 13.5(c)(1), Ala. R.Crim. P., provides:
"A motion to dismiss the indictment may be based upon objections to the venire, the lack of legal qualifications of an individual grand juror, the legal insufficiency of the indictment, or the failure of the indictment to charge an offense."
The State is correct in its contention that Rule 13.5(c)(1) does not provide for the dismissal of an indictment based on the insufficiency of the evidence or, as in this case, a possible lack of evidence. See State v. Edwards, 590 So.2d 379 (Ala.Crim.App.1991)(establishment of the corpus delicti requires proof of facts by the State so entwined with the merits of the case that a decision as to whether it had been proved should not be made before trial but should be postponed until trial); State v. McClain, 911 So.2d 54 (Ala.Crim.App.2005)(trial court cannot dismiss the indictment based on a lack of evidence).
Accordingly, the order of the trial court granting Lakisha Foster's motion to dismiss her indictment is reversed and the cause is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ankrom v. State
...that the sufficiency of the State's evidence is not a ground upon which a trial court may dismiss an indictment); State v. Foster, 935 So.2d 1216, 1216 (Ala.Crim.App.2005) (holding that an alleged insufficiency of the evidence or possibility that the State will be unable to meet its burden ......
-
State v. Jemison
...of the indictment, or the failure of the indictment to charge an offense.” Worley, ––– So.3d at ––––, quoting State v. Foster, 935 So.2d 1216 (Ala.Crim.App.2005), and citing Rule 13.5(c)(1), Ala. R.Crim. P. Thus, whereas Rule 13.5(c)(1) allows for the pretrial dismissal of an indictment onl......
-
State v. Worley
...of the offense charged in the indictment cannot be the basis for the pretrial dismissal of an indictment. In State v. Foster, 935 So.2d 1216, 1216–17 (Ala.Crim.App.2005), this court explained its rationale as follows: “ ‘Rule 13.5(c)(1), Ala. R.Crim. P., provides: “ ‘ “A motion to dismiss t......
-
State v. Stallworth
...So. 2d 54 (Ala. Crim. App. 2005) (trial court cannot dismiss the indictment based on a lack of evidence).’ "[ State v. Foster, 935 So.2d 1216, 1216-17 (Ala. Crim. App. 2005).] SeeState v. Anderson, 8 So. 3d 1033 (Ala. Crim. App. 2008). SeealsoUnited States v. Sharpe, 438 F.3d 1257, 1263 (11......