State v. Freerks
Decision Date | 14 June 1918 |
Docket Number | No. 20968.,20968. |
Citation | 140 Minn. 349,168 N.W. 23 |
Parties | STATE v. FREERKS. |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Case Certified from District Court, Big Stone County; S. A. Flaherty, Judge.
George W. Freerks was indicted for orally advocating that the citizens of the state should not aid or assist the United States in prosecuting the war. Demurrer to indictment overruled, and case certified to Supreme Court for determination of question raised by the demurrer. Question answered in affirmative, order overruling demurrer affirmed, and case remanded for further proceedings.
Syllabus by the Court
The indictment set forth in the opinion states facts sufficient to constitute a public offense under the provision of section 3, chapter 463, Laws 1917 (Gen. St. Supp. 1917, § 8521-3). C. L. Hilton, Atty. Gen., J. E. Markham, Asst. Atty. Gen., Linus O'Malley, of St. Paul, and Chas. E. Houston, of Wheaton, for the State.
Ray G. Farrington, of Ortonville, for defendant.
The court below overruled the demurrer of defendant to the indictment hereafter set forth, and certified the case to this court for its opinion on the question raised by the demurrer that is, whether the facts alleged in the indictment constitute a public offense. The indictment is as follows:
‘George W. Freerks is accused by the grand jury of the county of Big Stone by this indictment of the crime of advocating by oral speech that the citizens of this state should not aid or assist the United States in prosecuting or carrying on war with the public enemies of the United States, committed as follows:
‘That the said George W. Freerks, on the twenty-first day of January, in the year nineteen hundred and eighteen, at the city of Ortonville, in the county of Big Stone, in the state of Minnesota, then and there being, did wrongfully and unlawfully advocate by oral speech, uttered by him, the said George W. Freerks, in the presence and hearing of Thomas Finley, Robert Jones and Julius Fenner, that the citizens of the state of Minnesota should not aid and assist the United States in prosecuting and carrying on war with the public enemies of the United States, namely, the German Empire, and he, the said George W. Freerks, did then and there for such purpose say: -against the statute in such case made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the state of Minnesota.
‘Dated at Ortonville, in the county of Big Stone, the twenty-second day of March, nineteen hundred and eighteen.’
It is plain that the indictment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Goldberg v. Brule Timber Company
... ... parties under it are governed by the statutes of Michigan as ... construed by the courts of that state. 6 Cyc. 1060; ... Swedish-American Nat. Bank of Minneapolis v. First Nat ... Bank of Gardner, 89 Minn. 98, 94 N.W. 218, 99 Am. St ... 549; Green ... ...
-
Goldberg v. Brule Timber Co.
... ... mortgage, and its validity and the rights of the parties under it are governed by the statutes of Michigan as construed by the courts of that state. 6 Cyc. 1060; Swedish American Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank, 89 Minn. 98, 94 N. W. 218,99 Am. St. Rep. 549;Green v. Van Buskirk, 7 Wall. 139, 19 L ... ...
-
State v. Gilbert
...from aiding the United States in carrying on the war. State v. Holm, 139 Minn. 267, 166 N. W. 181, L. R. A. 1918C, 304; State v. Freerks, 140 Minn. ——, 168 N. W. 23. The declaration that the world must be made safe for democracy had been acclaimed throughout the entire country as expressive......
-
State v. Gilbert
...and from aiding the United States in carrying on the war. State v. Holm, 139 Minn. 267, 166 N. W. 181, L.R.A. 1918C, 304; State v. Freerks, 140 Minn. 349, 168 N. W. 23. The declaration that the world must be made safe for democracy had been acclaimed throughout the entire country as express......