State v. Furgerson
Decision Date | 31 October 1899 |
Citation | 152 Mo. 92,53 S.W. 427 |
Parties | STATE v. FURGERSON. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Grundy county; P. C. Stepp, Judge.
William Furgerson was convicted of murder in the first degree, and appeals. Reversed.
O. G. Williams and S. C. Price, for appellant. Edward C. Crow, Atty. Gen., and Sam B. Jeffries, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree, and his punishment fixed at death, for having on the 25th day of March, 1897, at Grundy county, killed and murdered one Stephen G. Wilson with an ax. He appeals.
The indictment, leaving off the formal parts, is as follows: The trial at which defendant was convicted was the second one, there having theretofore been a mistrial. At the time of the homicide, defendant and deceased lived in the city of Trenton, defendant being engaged in the business of private detective, and claimed to be in the employ of a life insurance company in which the deceased held a policy for $5,000, and as such detective endeavoring to find some clue which would lead to the discovery of the murderer. At that time, and for several years prior thereto, the deceased, Wilson, was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Graves
...to the rights of the defendant: neither was there an objection to such instruction nor exceptions saved thereto. State v. Furgerson, 53 S.W. 427, 152 Mo. 92; State v. Mace, 278 S.W. 718; State v. Mosley, 22 S.W. (2d) 784; State v. Bunch, 333 Mo. 20, 62 S.W. (2d) 439; State v. Herring, 92 S.......
-
State v. Pierson
...and unwarranted by the record that the trial had been delayed for a year at defendant's instance. State v. Woolard, 111 Mo. 248; State v. Ferguson, 152 Mo. 92; State Eudaly, 188 S.W. 110; State v. Wigger, 196 Mo. 90. Stratton Shartel, Attorney-General, Edward G. Robison, Assistant Attorney-......
-
The State v. Stegner
...of the accusation against him. [1 Bish. Cr. Pro. (2 Ed.) Section 77, p. 59; State v. Birks, 199 Mo. 263, 97 S.W. 578; State v. Furgerson, 152 Mo. 92, 53 S.W. 427; Id. 162 Mo. 668; Const. Mo. Art. 2, Section 221.] so doing, it necessarily follows, as we hold, that it sufficiently conforms to......
-
State v. Graves
... ... Wilhite, 159 S.W.2d 768. (10) ... Trial court did not err in giving Instruction 22, and the ... giving of such instruction was not prejudicial to the rights ... of the defendant: neither was there an objection to such ... instruction nor exceptions saved thereto. State v ... Furgerson, 53 S.W. 427, 152 Mo. 92; State v ... Mace, 278 S.W. 718; State v. Mosley, 22 S.W.2d ... 784; State v. Bunch, 333 Mo. 20, 62 S.W.2d 439; ... State v. Herring, 92 S.W.2d 132; State v ... Jackson, 102 S.W.2d 612, 340 Mo. 748. (11) The trial ... court did not commit error in ... ...