State v. Furgerson

Decision Date31 October 1899
Citation152 Mo. 92,53 S.W. 427
PartiesSTATE v. FURGERSON.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Grundy county; P. C. Stepp, Judge.

William Furgerson was convicted of murder in the first degree, and appeals. Reversed.

O. G. Williams and S. C. Price, for appellant. Edward C. Crow, Atty. Gen., and Sam B. Jeffries, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BURGESS, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree, and his punishment fixed at death, for having on the 25th day of March, 1897, at Grundy county, killed and murdered one Stephen G. Wilson with an ax. He appeals.

The indictment, leaving off the formal parts, is as follows: "The grand jurors for the state of Missouri, and from the body of Grundy county, duly impaneled, sworn, and charged upon their oaths, present and charge that one William Furgerson, on the 25th day of March, 1897, at Grundy county, Missouri, in and upon one Stephen G. Wilson, then and there being, feloniously, willfully, deliberately, premeditately, and of his malice afore-thought did make an assault, and a certain ax, a deadly weapon, by him, the said William Furgerson, held in his hands, the said William Furgerson did then and there feloniously, willfully, deliberately, premeditately, and of his malice aforethought forcibly strike and beat the said Stephen G. Wilson, in and upon the body of the said Stephen G. Wilson, crushing, fracturing, and breaking the skull of the said Stephen G. Wilson, giving to him the said Stephen G. Wilson a mortal wound, of which said mortal wound he, the said Stephen G. Wilson, did then and there instantly die. And so the grand jurors aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid, do say that the said William Furgerson, him, the said Stephen G. Wilson, in the manner and by the means aforesaid, feloniously, willfully, deliberately, premeditately, on purpose, and of his malice aforethought did kill and murder; against the peace and dignity of the state. And the grand jurors aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid, do further charge and present that the said William Furgerson on the said 25th day of March, 1897, at said Grundy county, Missouri, in and upon the body of the said Stephen G. Wilson then and there being, feloniously, willfully, deliberately, premeditately, on purpose, and of his malice aforethought did make an assault, and that he, the said William Furgerson, some heavy instrument or deadly weapon, to these jurors unknown, which said instrument or deadly weapon he, the said William Furgerson, in his hand then and there had and held, then and there feloniously, willfully, deliberately, premeditately, on purpose, and of his malice aforethought did forcibly strike and beat the said Stephen G. Wilson in and upon the body of the said Stephen G. Wilson, crushing, fracturing, and breaking the skull of the said Stephen G. Wilson, giving to him, the said Stephen G. Wilson, a mortal wound, of which said mortal wound he, the said Stephen G. Wilson, did then and there instantly die; and so the grand jurors aforesaid do say that the said William Furgerson him, the said Stephen G. Wilson, in the manner and by the means aforesaid, feloniously, willfully, deliberately, premeditately, on purpose, and of his malice aforethought did kill and murder; against the peace and dignity of the state." The trial at which defendant was convicted was the second one, there having theretofore been a mistrial. At the time of the homicide, defendant and deceased lived in the city of Trenton, defendant being engaged in the business of private detective, and claimed to be in the employ of a life insurance company in which the deceased held a policy for $5,000, and as such detective endeavoring to find some clue which would lead to the discovery of the murderer. At that time, and for several years prior thereto, the deceased, Wilson, was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
86 cases
  • State v. Graves
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1944
    ...to the rights of the defendant: neither was there an objection to such instruction nor exceptions saved thereto. State v. Furgerson, 53 S.W. 427, 152 Mo. 92; State v. Mace, 278 S.W. 718; State v. Mosley, 22 S.W. (2d) 784; State v. Bunch, 333 Mo. 20, 62 S.W. (2d) 439; State v. Herring, 92 S.......
  • State v. Pierson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1932
    ...and unwarranted by the record that the trial had been delayed for a year at defendant's instance. State v. Woolard, 111 Mo. 248; State v. Ferguson, 152 Mo. 92; State Eudaly, 188 S.W. 110; State v. Wigger, 196 Mo. 90. Stratton Shartel, Attorney-General, Edward G. Robison, Assistant Attorney-......
  • The State v. Stegner
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1918
    ...of the accusation against him. [1 Bish. Cr. Pro. (2 Ed.) Section 77, p. 59; State v. Birks, 199 Mo. 263, 97 S.W. 578; State v. Furgerson, 152 Mo. 92, 53 S.W. 427; Id. 162 Mo. 668; Const. Mo. Art. 2, Section 221.] so doing, it necessarily follows, as we hold, that it sufficiently conforms to......
  • State v. Graves
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1944
    ... ... Wilhite, 159 S.W.2d 768. (10) ... Trial court did not err in giving Instruction 22, and the ... giving of such instruction was not prejudicial to the rights ... of the defendant: neither was there an objection to such ... instruction nor exceptions saved thereto. State v ... Furgerson, 53 S.W. 427, 152 Mo. 92; State v ... Mace, 278 S.W. 718; State v. Mosley, 22 S.W.2d ... 784; State v. Bunch, 333 Mo. 20, 62 S.W.2d 439; ... State v. Herring, 92 S.W.2d 132; State v ... Jackson, 102 S.W.2d 612, 340 Mo. 748. (11) The trial ... court did not commit error in ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT