State v. Gallagher, ED 79452.
Decision Date | 14 May 2002 |
Docket Number | No. ED 79452.,ED 79452. |
Citation | 75 S.W.3d 333 |
Parties | STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Timothy GALLAGHER, Defendant/Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court City of St. Louis, Donald L. McCullin, Judge.
Jennifer F. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Appellant, Timothy Gallagher, appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine base, in violation of section 195.202, RSMo 2000. He argues the trial court abused its discretion in excluding impeachment evidence.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial did not err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gallagher v. State, ED 85122.
...Department of Corrections. Movant appealed the judgment of his conviction and sentence, and this Court affirmed in State v. Gallagher, 75 S.W.3d 333 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). Movant timely filed his pro se and amended motions, pursuant to Rule 29.15, alleging ineffective assistance of his trial W......
- State v. Willbanks