State v. Gaston
Decision Date | 02 February 2016 |
Docket Number | No. 32723-0-III,32723-0-III |
Court | Washington Court of Appeals |
Parties | STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DENNIS NEAL GASTON, Appellant. |
FEARING, J. — Dennis Gaston appeals his conviction for child molestation in the second degree on numerous evidentiary grounds. He also contends the State committed misconduct during its closing statement. We hold that the trial court committed harmful evidentiary error by admitting a statement uttered by Gaston during a police interview to the effect that he suffered from "urges." We reverse his conviction and remand for a new trial.
On an unidentified day in the spring of 2013, J.W., a minor, rode his bicycle from his mother's house to his grandmother's residence in picturesque Goldendale. While journeying across town, J.W. stopped when he saw an adult family friend, Dennis Gaston, in the latter's driveway. J.W. parked his bicycle in Gaston's driveway and walked to the carport where Gaston stood. The two conversed about cars, whether J.W. had a girlfriend, and whether J.W. engaged in sex with a girl. According to J.W., Gaston reached down J.W.'s loose blue jeans, underneath his underwear, and rubbed his penis for one to two minutes. Gaston asked J.W. if J.W. was getting hard. J.W. did not reply.
On August 29, 2013, Goldendale Police Officers Dwayne Matulovich and Leo Lucatero questioned Dennis Gaston at the Goldendale police station. The officers recorded and transcribed the interview. During the station interview, Gaston first claimed he only touched J.W. on the shoulder. Officer Lucatero prefaced the questioning with the kindly remarks:
Officer Leo Lucatero spoke to Dennis Gaston in the third person:
You know, but we're giving you an opportunity right now to, you know, tell us straight up, you know, if you—if something happened, you know, um, let's talk about it, let's deal with it. If Dennis has got any issues that he needs to deal with, let's—let's get you the assistance you need, if that's the case, get you the help you need. You know, we don't—we don't hate you. We're not trying to be mean or—or give you a hard time, but if there's—there's anything going on, Dennis, where something did happen, let's—let's lay our cards out on the table, let's—let's be straight up with it, and if we need to get Dennis some help, let-let-let's do that. Let's do that to, you know, prevent something like this from happening again, you know, if that's—if that's the case. But um, you know, I—I dealt with the (Norman) case and got all his information and talked to you, and then when I come in today, I hear about this and I hear the details, and uh, you know, Officer Matulovich read it too, you know, and uh, we uh, compared notes and—and they're—it's just—for me it's just too many similarities to just shrug it off and say they're coincidence. Um, you know, we need—we're—we need to get down to the bottom of this and figure out what happened. Now we're giving you the opportunity right now, Dennis, to—to be straight up with us if something did happen. Did something happen?
Dennis Gaston then conceded that he touched J.W. on the leg and later confessed to touching the boy on the thigh. He denied putting his hand in J.W.'s pants. Officer Lucatero declined Gaston's offer to touch the officer's leg in order to illustrate how Gaston touched J.W.
During the police station interview, Officer Leo Lucatero next told Dennis Gaston that an adult man in the community reported to police that Gaston solicited sex from him. Ex. at 8-9. Lucatero added:
Ex. 1 at 10-11. During legal proceedings, Dennis Gaston contended that the two officers unfairly and repeatedly equated soliciting homosexual sex with pedophilia.
After Officer Leo Lucatero repeatedly told Dennis Gaston that the legal system could and would help him, Gaston discussed dealing with "urges." The admissibility attrial of Gaston's admission of urges is the principal issue on appeal. Gaston informed the two Goldendale officers:
Late in the interview, Dennis Gaston mentioned being sexually abused as a boy by an older male cousin. He then added:
Well, and I've wanted [help]. I've actually went to counselors before and—they don't help, you know.
Ex. 1 at 16. Officer Leo Lucatero then asked Gaston to disclose his interaction with J.W. during the spring day. Gaston would again only concede touching J.W.on the thigh. Lucatero stated he did not believe Gaston, because Gaston had already conceded "urges." Ex. 1 at 17. Lucatero claimed to look into Gaston's eyes and see pain in Gaston's soul. Gaston insisted that all he could remember is touching J.W. on the thigh.
The State of Washington charged Dennis Gaston with child molestation in the second degree. Dennis Gaston moved in limine, pursuant to ER 402 and 403, to exclude any mention regarding allegations of same sex sexual contact between him and adults. The trial court granted the motion.
The trial court conducted a CrR 3.5 hearing to determine the admissibility of Dennis Gaston's statements to the police during the August 29 interview. The State wished to read to the trial jury Gaston's comments about his urges. Dennis Gaston objected to the admission of these statements by referencing the order in limine previously entered by the trial court. Gaston added that his comments about urges constituted ER 404(b) evidence and was inadmissible for this additional reason. He contended that his comment did not amount to a confession of the crime, since he told the police officers that he did not act on his urges. In response to Gaston's ER 404(b) argument, the State did not contend that the testimony was admissible under one of the enumerated purposes in the evidence rule. This lack of a response is a significant factor in this appeal.
After hearing argument, the judge conducted an ER 403 balancing test on the record, saying:
To continue reading
Request your trial