State v. George

Decision Date08 June 1909
Citation221 Mo. 519,120 S.W. 35
PartiesSTATE v. GEORGE.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Camden County; A. W. Lincoln, Judge.

Joseph F. George, Jr., was convicted of rape, and appeals. Affirmed.

Elliott W. Major, Atty. Gen., and Chas. G. Revelle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

FOX, J.

This cause is brought to this court by appeal on the part of the defendant from a judgment of the circuit court of Camden county, Mo., convicting him of the crime of rape. The offense of which the defendant was convicted, omitting formal parts of the information, is thus charged: "Joe V. Foster, prosecuting attorney, duly elected, commissioned, sworn, qualified, installed and acting as such in and for said county of Camden, in the state of Missouri, upon his said oath and upon his hereto appended oath, informs the court upon his said oath and upon his hereto appended oath does depose, present, aver and charge that said defendant, Joseph F. George, Jr., on the 5th day of August, A. D. 1904, at the county of Camden, state of Missouri, in and upon one Ida Florence George, a female child under the age of fourteen years, to wit, of the age of thirteen years, unlawfully and feloniously did make an assault, and her, the said Ida Florence George, then and there unlawfully and feloniously did carnally know and abuse, against the peace and dignity of the state of Missouri." To this information the defendant entered his plea of not guilty, and upon trial was convicted, and his punishment assessed at five years' imprisonment in the penitentiary.

At the very threshold of the consideration of this case, it is earnestly insisted by the learned Attorney General that there is nothing before this court for review except the record proper. We have carefully analyzed the record as presented to this court upon this appeal, and find that it absolutely fails to disclose that there was a motion for new trial filed or the overruling of any motion for a new trial, or that there was any bill of exceptions filed. It is essential that the record proper show the filing of a motion for new trial and the overruling of it. While the bill of exceptions should show the filing of the motion for new trial and the action of the court upon such motion, yet, in addition to this, it is absolutely essential that the record proper show that the motion for new trial was filed and the ruling of the court upon it. In the recent case of Stark v. Zehnder, 204 Mo. 442, 102 S. W. 992, Judge Valliant, in speaking of this subject, thus very clearly announced the correct rule: "We should not dismiss the appeal in this case because we...

To continue reading

Request your trial
39 cases
  • McQueeny v. National Fidelity Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1942
    ... ... 167, 44 S.Ct. 90, 91 L.Ed. 255; Secs. 3027, 3033, R. S. 1939; ... Stahl v. American Natl. Assur. Co., 70 S.W.2d 78; ... State ex rel. Commonwealth Cas. Co. v. Cox, 14 ... S.W.2d 600, 322 Mo. 38; Miller v. Mo. Life Ins. Co., ... 186 S.W. 762, 194 Mo.App. 265; Mutual ... ...
  • State v. Cason
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 9, 1923
    ...statute. Section 3247, R. S. 1919; State v. Jenkins (Mo. Sup.) 225 S. W. 988; State v. Hughes, 258 Mo. 264, 167 S. W. 529; State y. George, 221 Mo. 519, 120 S. W. 35; State v. Griffin, 249 Mo. 624, 155 S. W. 432; State v. Warren, 232 Mo. 185,134 S. W. 522, Ann. Cas. 1912B, "2. The verdict o......
  • Hatch Brothers Company v. Black
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1918
    ... ... v. Carpenter, 9 Wyo. 110, 122; ... Willey v. Decker, 11 Wyo. 496, 515; all of which are ... analagous.) The only statute of this state or territory which ... ever gave countenance to the common law doctrine was the ... statute of 1869, and which was in effect from 1869 to 1877, ... 301; In re. Lord & Polk Chemical Co., 7 ... Del. Chan. 248, 44 A. 775, 777; Hamilton v ... Schoenberger, 47 Ia. 385, 387; State v. George, ... 226 Mo. 717, 120 S.W. 35, 43; Com. v. Dennis, 105 ... Mass. 162; Drady v. District Court, 126 Ia. 345, 102 ... N.W. 115, 117; Graves v ... ...
  • McQueeny v. National Fidelity Life Ins. Co., 37210.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1942
    ...46 S.W. (2d) 523; Tabler v. General American Life Ins. Company, 342 Mo. 726, 117 S.W. (2d) 278; Winters v. Reserve Loan Life Ins. Company, 221 Mo. 519, 290 S.W. 109, and other cases. These cases, upon their facts, are distinguishable from the cases relied upon by appellant. The difference b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT