State v. Gill

Decision Date01 June 1905
Citation190 Mo. 79,88 S.W. 628
PartiesSTATE ex rel. GAULT et al. v. GILL et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Quo warranto proceedings by the state, on the relation of J. W. Gault and another, against E. B. Gill and others, to oust defendants from the offices of school directors of a school district. From a judgment for defendants, relators appeal. Affirmed.

Ward & Hadley, for appellants. Frank P. Sebree, Silver & Brown, and E. B. Gill, for respondents.

BRACE, C. J.

Quo warranto to oust defendants from the offices of school directors of the school district of Dallas, in Jackson county, Mo. Appeal from the Jackson county circuit court. Judgment below for the respondents, and the relators appeal.

On the 13th of May, 1903, and for many years prior thereto, there was a common school district in said county, duly organized as school district No. 4, township 48, range 33, in which there resided about 50 qualified voters, and in which there was an unincorporated village called Dallas, a plat of which had been duly executed, acknowledged, and recorded in the office of the recorder of deeds of said county on the 15th of January, 1903. By section 9861, art. 2, c. 154, Rev. St. 1899, it is provided: "Whenever it may be desired to organize a common school district into a city, town or village school district, with special privileges granted under this article, the board of directors shall, upon the reception of a petition to that effect and signed by ten qualified voters who are resident taxpayers of the district, order an election held for that purpose, and shall give notice of such election by notices posted in five public places within the district for fifteen days prior to the day of such election, said meeting to be held at 2 o'clock p. m. at the public school house in said district, if there be one, but if there be no public school house, then at such place within the district as may be designated in the notices; and when said meeting is assembled, it shall elect a chairman and secretary, who shall keep a correct record of the proceedings of said meeting, and turn the same over to the board, properly signed and attested by the chairman, and the board shall have a copy of the same entered upon the district records. Said election may be held at an annual or at a special meeting, and the order of business under this section shall be as follows: First—To organize as a city, town or village school district; those voting for the organization shall have written or printed on their ballots `For Organization,' and those voting against the organization shall have written or printed on their ballots `Against Organization'; and each person desiring to vote shall advance to the front of the chairman and deposit his ballot in a box to be used for that purpose. When all present shall have voted the chairman shall appoint two tellers, who shall call each ballot aloud, and the secretary shall keep a tally and report to the chairman, who shall announce the result; and if a majority of the votes cast are `For organization,'...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • State ex rel. Kugler v. Tillatson
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 14 Abril 1958
    ...that the Board had no real discretionary power, but only the ministerial duty of ordering the election (citing State ex rel. Gault v. Gill, 190 Mo. 79, 88 S.W. 628, 630; State ex rel. McCain v. Acom, Mo.App., 236 S.W.2d 749). None of the cases cited present the question which we have here. ......
  • State ex rel. and to Use of Parman v. Manring
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 3 Marzo 1933
    ...that the duty of a school superintendent in locating boundary lines differs from the ministerial duty, to call an election. [State ex rel. Gault v. Gill, supra.] But in the case, as the agreed statement of facts shows, it was the intention of the superintendent to include defendant's land i......
  • State ex Inf. Mansur v. McKown
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 20 Diciembre 1926
    ...... would tend to defeat the purpose and lessen the educational. advantages of [315 Mo. 1350] such districts [State ex inf. v. Bird, 295 Mo. 344, 244 S.W. l. c. 940; State ex inf. v. Jones, 266 Mo. 191, l. c. 201, 181 S.W. 50; State ex rel. v. Gill, 190 Mo. 79, 88 S.W. 628; State ex rel. v. Foxworthy, 256 S.W. l. c. 468.]. . .          The. Court of Appeals of Kentucky in Williams v. Lovelace, 90 S.W. l. c. 984, in passing upon the legal. effect of the election of six instead of five, the authorized. number of trustees ......
  • State v. McKown
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 20 Diciembre 1926
    ...ex inf. v. Bird, 295 Mo. 344, 244 S. W. loc. cit. 940; State ex inf. v. Jones, 266 Mo. 191, loc. cit. 201, 181 S. W. 50; State ex inf. v. Gill, 190 Mo. 79, 88 S. W. 628; State ex rel. v. Foxworthy, 301 Mo. 376, 256 S. W. loc. cit. The Court of Appeals of Kentucky in Williams v. Lovelace, 90......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT