State v. Gilmore
Decision Date | 09 November 1891 |
Citation | 17 S.W. 490,106 Mo. 436 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE, to Use of COLLIER, v. GILMORE et al. |
Appeal from circuit court, Andrew county; C. A. ANTHONY, Judge.
Action by the state to the use of Samuel Collier. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Transferred to Kansas City court of appeals.
David Rea, for appellant. C. F. Booher, Wm. Herren, and J. A. Sanders, for respondent.
It is quite apparent from the evidence in this cause that there is no such "amount in dispute" as is requisite to confer jurisdiction on this court. The cause must therefore be transferred to the court of appeals at Kansas City. All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Vanderberg v. Kansas City, Missouri, Gas Co.
... ... The amount in dispute is ... insufficient. The amount in dispute is not determined by the ... prayer of the petition, but by the record. State, etc., ... v. Gilmore, 106 Mo. 436; May v. Jarvis-Conklin ... Co., 138 Mo. 186; Wilson v. Russler, 162 Mo ... 565; Anchor Milling Co. v. Walsh, ... ...
-
Vanderberg v. Kansas City, Mo., Gas Co.
...Wilson v. Russler, 162 Mo. 565, 63 S. W. 370 (decided in banc); Anchor Milling Co. v. Walsh, 97 Mo. 287, 11 S. W. 217; State ex rel. v. Gilmore, 106 Mo. 436, 17 S. W. 490. See the reasoning in Harris v. Rosenberger (C. C. A.) 145 Fed. 449, on the kindred matter of a constitutional question,......
- State To the Use of Collier v. Gilmore