State v. Giorgi
| Decision Date | 12 January 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 77-439-M,77-439-M |
| Citation | 382 A.2d 535 |
| Parties | STATE of Rhode Island v. Robert C. GIORGI. P. |
| Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Julius C. Michaelson, Atty. Gen., Alfred French Goldstein, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff.
Lovett & Linder, Ltd., Raul L. Lovett, Providence, for defendant.
This case comes before us on a Rule 9 motion for release pending appeal. For that reason we do not review the action of the trial justice, but rather hear the motion de novo.
In this case the defendant is appealing from a denial of a motion to reduce sentence. His original appeal has been heard and denied. State v. Giorgi, 115 R.I. 1, 339 A.2d 268 (1975). His request in this case is in the nature of a request for bail pending post conviction relief. We have recently said that:
"This court has never granted bail to an individual who has sought what for all intents and purposes is post conviction relief." State v. Abbott and Freeman, R.I., 366 A.2d 1132, 1135 (1976).
Accordingly, the motion of the defendant for release on bail pending appeal is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Feng, 77-274-M
...purposes is post conviction relief." Id. at 220, 366 A.2d at 1135. Although we have consistently followed that policy, see State v. Giorgi, R.I., 382 A.2d 535 (1978), and State v. Williams, R.I., 382 A.2d 536 (1978), our ruling in Abbott II does not necessarily signify that upon analysis of......