State v. Gmelich
Decision Date | 24 December 1907 |
Citation | 106 S.W. 618,208 Mo. 152 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. EATON et al. v. GMELICH, State Treasurer. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Act April 15, 1905 (Sess. Acts 1905, p. 292 [Ann. St. 1906, p. 3717]), created a state sanatorium, and section 24 made laws governing other eleemosynary institutions applicable to it. Rev. St. 1899, § 7808 [Ann. St. 1906, p. 3710], requires moneys received by such institutions to be paid to the State Treasurer, and by him placed in respective funds created by such sections. Section 7809 provides that moneys in the state treasury to the credit of any such fund shall be appropriated for the support of the institution to which the fund belongs. Act April 15, 1907 (Laws 1907, p. 37) § 27a, appropriated out of the state treasury chargeable to the "Missouri state sanatorium fund" a specified sum, "the same being derived from the payment into the state treasury by the treasurer or other financial officer of said institution." Act March 19, 1907 (Laws 1907, p. 309) § 15, requires the superintendent of the sanatorium to furnish the State Treasurer sufficient data to enable him to collect from the various counties, etc., sums owing the institution for care, etc., of patients. Section 16 (page 310) gives indigent patients the preference over private patients. Held, that the Legislature intended that an institution's receipts be used to defray its running expenses, and not that they go to the state's general revenue fund, and that the "Missouri state sanatorium fund" was created by section 27a, though not in express terms.
3. SAME.
Moneys received by the State Treasurer under such section 15 (Laws 1907, p. 309) from the different counties are moneys "derived from the payment into the state treasury by the treasurer or other financial officer of said institution" within such section 27a (Laws 1907, p. 37), since by section 15 the State Treasurer has been made a financial officer of the institution, and as such falls within the term "other financial officer."
In Banc. Petition by the state, on the relation of J. L. Eaton and others, for mandamus to J. F. Gmelich, State Treasurer. Writ awarded.
James F. Ball, for relators. The Attorney General and N. T. Gentry, for respondent.
This is an original proceeding in this court, wherein the relators, who constitute the board of managers of the Missouri state sanatorium, seek, by writ of mandamus, to compel respondent, who is State Treasurer, to open an account in the books of his office with the said Missouri state sanatorium in the name of the "Missouri State Sanatorium Fund," and to place to the credit of said fund the sum of $17.89, which said respondent has collected from the city of St. Louis as pay for keeping and maintaining indigent patients from said city in the sanatorium, and to further place to the credit of such fund any and all other moneys collected from the like or any other source for such sanatorium, and to pay out such funds for the maintenance of said sanatorium upon orders issued by the proper officers of said sanatorium. Relators aver that by virtue of section 27a of the act of the General Assembly approved April 15, 1907 (Laws 1907, p. 37), and section 15 of an act of the General Assembly, approved March 19, 1907 (Laws 1907, p. 309), and section 7808, Rev. St. 1899 [Ann. St. 1906, p. 3710], it became and was the duty of respondent to open up an account as aforesaid, and to collect and credit the moneys as aforesaid, and to pay the same out in the manner and for the purpose as aforesaid. These several statutes are as follows:
Respondent, by his return, says: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Curtis v. Sexton
... ... the Courts of Appeals in cases in which the Courts of Appeals ... are invested by the Constitution and laws of the State with ... jurisdiction to adjudge, even though its judgment on the ... merits be erroneous, or in conflict with the opinions of the ... Supreme ... thereof, in accord with the intention of the Legislature is ... fundamental. [ State ex rel. Eaton v. Gmelich, 208 ... Mo. 152, 106 S.W. 618; Grimes v. Reynolds, 184 Mo ... 679, 83 S.W. 1132.] The intention here evidenced is plain and ... unmistakable ... ...
-
State v. Schwartzmann Service
... ... State, but this rule affords no warrant for a construction ... out of harmony with the manifest purpose and intent of the ... statute. [1 Kent's Commentaries 461; Grimes v ... Reynolds, 94 Mo.App. 576, 68 S.W. 588, affirmed 184 Mo ... 679, 83 S.W. 1132; State ex rel. v. Gmelich, 208 Mo ... 152, 106 S.W. 618; State ex rel. v. McQuillin, 246 ... Mo. 517, 534, 152 S.W. 347; Connecticut Mutual Life Ins ... Co. v. Albert, 39 Mo. 181; Sedalia ex rel. v ... Smith, 206 Mo. 346, 361, 104 S.W. 15; State v ... Bulling, 100 Mo. 87, 12 S.W. 356; State v. Combs ... (Mo.), 273 ... ...
-
Lewellen et al. v. Lewellen
... ... Grimes v. Reynolds, 184 Mo. 679, 83 S.W. 1132; Keeny v. McVay, 206 Mo. 42, 103 S.W. 946; State ex rel. Eaton v. Gmelich, 208 Mo. 152, 106 S.W. 618. (2) A thing which is in the intention of the makers of the statute is as much within the statute ... ...
-
Lewellen v. Lewellen
... ... Grimes v ... Reynolds, 184 Mo. 679, 83 S.W. 1132; Keeny v ... McVay, 206 Mo. 42, 103 S.W. 946; State ex rel. Eaton ... v. Gmelich, 208 Mo. 152, 106 S.W. 618. (2) A thing which ... is in the intention of the makers of the statute is as much ... ...