State v. Gooding

Decision Date28 September 1927
Docket Number141.
Citation139 S.E. 436,194 N.C. 271
PartiesSTATE v. GOODING.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Jones County; Cranmer, Judge.

John Gooding was convicted of the possession of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals from a judgment enforcing a suspended sentence. Error.

Judgment entered after time for which it was suspended held void.

The facts determinative of the question presented are as follows:

At the September term, 1925, Jones superior court, in an action appearing on the minute docket as No. 53 (State v. John Gooding), the defendant waived the finding of a bill and entered a plea of "guilty possessing liquor" whereupon Hon. W. M. Bond, judge presiding, as appears from the record, entered the following judgment "Fine $150 and costs. Prayer for judgment continued for 12 months. Defendant required to give bond in the sum of $150 for his appearance here for two years to show good behavior."

The clerk of the superior court of Jones county, in response to request from the Attorney General, certifies that the following entries appear upon the minutes of the court:

"Fall term, 1925. Defendant waives finding of bill and pleads guilty. Fine $150 and costs. Prayer for judgment continued for 12 months. Defendant required to give bond in the sum of $150 for his appearance at the next two terms of court and pay the costs. Spring term, 1926, continued under former order. Fall term, 1926, off. Bill of costs and fine of $150, paid at the fall term, 1925."

Thereafter judgment was entered in the same cause by Hon. E. H. Cranmer, judge presiding, at the March term, 1927, as follows:

"The court finds that the condition upon which the prayer was continued has been violated; therefore it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant, John Gooding, be confined in the common jail of Jones county for a term of 12 months, and assigned to work the roads of Lenoir county."

From this latter judgment, the defendant appeals, assigning error.

Shaw & Jones, of Kinston, for appellant.

D. G. Brummitt, Atty. Gen., and Frank Nash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the state.

STACY C.J.

There are several reasons why the judgment in this case, from which the defendant appeals, cannot be sustained.

In the first place, the only thing definite and certain about the judgment entered at the September term, 1925, is the fine of $150 and costs. If the defendant were not entitled to be discharged upon the payment of this fine and costs, which he may have been, it is clear that under the next sentence, "prayer for judgment continued for 12 months," no judgment could be entered after the lapse of one year, or 12 months, which expired September, 1926. Therefore the judgment rendered at the March term, 1927, is without warrant of law and must be held for naught. State v. Hilton, 151 N.C. 687, 65 S.E. 1011.

In the next...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Ex parte Boyd
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
    • February 4, 1942
    ... ...          Original ... proceeding in habeas corpus by Jerry Wilbur Boyd to secure ... his release from the State Reformatory at Granite, Oklahoma ...          Writ ... [122 P.2d 164] ...          Sid ... White, of Oklahoma City, for ... Zolantakis, 70 Utah 296, 259 P. 1044, 54 ... A.L.R. 1463; Ex parte Lucero, 23 N.M. 433, 168 P. 713, ... L.R.A.1918C, 549; State v. Gooding, 194 N.C. 271, ... 139 S.E. 436; Fleenor v. Hammond, 6 Cir., 116 F.2d ... 982, 132 A.L.R. 1241 ...          On the ... other hand, ... ...
  • State v. Jensen
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • December 18, 1985
    ...State v. Gibson, 156 N.J.Super. 516, 384 A.2d 178 (1978); People v. Cooper, 54 Misc.2d 42, 280 N.Y.S.2d 920 (1967); State v. Gooding, 194 N.C. 271, 139 S.E. 436 (1927); Thompson v. State, 620 P.2d 422 (Okla.Crim.App.1980); Bryant v. State, 233 Or. 459, 378 P.2d 951 (1963); State v. Taylor, ......
  • State v. Pelley
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 24, 1942
    ... ... defendant until after the expiration of five years from and ... after the 18th day of February, 1935, the Court would have ... been without authority to enter judgment. State v ... Hilton, 151 N.C. 687, 65 S.E. 1011; State v ... Gooding, 194 N.C. 271, 139 S.E. 436. However, at any ... time within five years after the entry of the judgment, upon ... alleged violation of the conditions upon which the judgment ... was suspended, the Court had the right to require the ... defendant to appear before said Court, by notice or by ... ...
  • State v. Wilson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 20, 1939
    ...of law." If such be the rule in respect of statutes, what shall be said of ambiguous judgments? The answer was given in State v. Gooding, 194 N.C. 271, 139 S.E. 436. defendant ought not to be required to guess at the meaning of a suspended judgment. The matters involved--the enforcement of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT