State v. Goodrich
Decision Date | 06 November 1911 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. SHERIDAN PUB. CO. v. GOODRICH, Judge. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Johnson & Lucas, for relator. Jay Read and Omar E. Robinson, for respondent.
This is an original proceeding for a writ of prohibition against the judge of the assignment division of the circuit court of Jackson county. The facts are undisputed and may be stated as follows:
The Graham Paper Company brought an action at law against the Sheridan Publishing Company (the present relator) in the circuit court of Jackson county. An answer was filed, and the trial of the cause was set for May 10, 1910. The cause was not tried on that date, and no entry relating to its disposition was made on any of the records kept by the clerk of the court. The honorable T. J. Seehorn was judge of the assignment division at that time, and on the docket kept by him the words "Dis. for want of pros." appear opposite the title of the cause. No judgment of dismissal was entered of record, and the cause was reassigned for trial on March 23, 1911, before the honorable James H. Slover, one of the judges of the court. On that date the relator appeared, and contended that the cause was not for trial, since it had been dismissed for want of prosecution. Thereupon Judge Slover returned it to the assignment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prasse v. Prasse
... ... issue and a grant of relief not posed or prayed by the ... plaintiff's petition. (a) A party cannot state one cause ... of action in his petition and recover upon another ... Schneider v. Patton, 175 Mo. 684, 75 S.W. 155; ... Irwin v. Chiles, 28 Mo ... records and it is necessary to enter a judgment in order to ... give it vitality. [State ex rel. Sheridan Publishing Co. v ... Goodrich, 159 Mo.App. 422, 140 S.W. 629.] By way of ... illustration we might point out that an attack upon the ... sufficiency of a petition would not be ... ...
-
Prasse v. Prasse
... ... (a) A party cannot state one cause of action in his petition and recover upon another. Schneider v. Patton, 175 Mo. 684, 75 S.W. 155; Irwin v. Chiles, 28 Mo. 576; Harris v ... [State ex rel. Sheridan Publishing Co. v. Goodrich, 159 Mo. App. 422, 140 S.W. 629.] By way of illustration we might point out that an attack upon the sufficiency of a petition would not be ... ...
-
Jeans v. Jeans
...403, 180 S.W. 1054, 1056-1057; Kreisel v. Snavely, 135 Mo.App. 155, 159, 115 S.W. 1059, 1061. See State ex rel. Sheridan Pub. Co. v. Goodrich, 159 Mo.App. 422, 425, 140 S.W. 629, 630-631.10 Schulte v. Schulte, Mo., 140 S.W.2d 51, 53(2); Stimson v. Cathedral Mining & Smelting Co., supra, 264......
-
State v. King
...Farris, Mo., 264 S.W. 363, 366 ; State ex rel. Gentry v. Westhues, 315 Mo. 672, 286 S.W. 396, 399; State ex rel. Sheridan Pub. Co. v. Goodrich, 159 Mo.App. App. 422, 425, 140 S.W. 629, 630. A judgment is the final judicial determination of the matter presented in the record. Sec. 511.020. '......