State v. Gordon

Decision Date20 March 1912
Citation147 S.W. 795
PartiesSTATE ex rel. MERCER COUNTY et al. v. GORDON, State Auditor.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

In Banc. Original mandamus proceeding on the relation of Mercer County and others against John P. Gordon, State Auditor. Peremptory writ granted.

E. M. Harber and I. B. Hyde & Son, for relators. Elliott W. Major, Atty. Gen., and Charles G. Revelle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BROWN, J.

Original action by mandamus in this court to compel respondent, as State Auditor, to register county bonds. On the 3d day of October, 1911, a special election was held in Mercer county, Mo., submitting to the qualified voters of that county a proposition to authorize the issue of $75,000 county bonds to raise money to build a courthouse. At said election, 1,474 votes were cast for and 369 votes against the issue of said bonds. More than two-thirds of the qualified votes cast in said election being in favor of said issue, the county court declared the proposition carried, issued the bonds authorized, and attempted to have the same registered and certified by respondent as Auditor of the State of Missouri. Respondent having refused to register and certify said bonds, this action was instituted on April 22, 1912, to compel him to do so. Respondent has filed his return to the alternative writ issued herein defending his action in refusing to register and certify said bonds, on the following grounds: (1) That the notice of election to authorize the issue of said bonds as published was in fact no notice at all, because it was only a copy of the order made by the county court requiring notice to be given. (2) That the notice of said special election to issue bonds failed to comply with sections 1261 and 1263, R. S. 1909, in that it failed to designate the polling places in Mercer county where said special election was to be held. Respondent also attacks the notice of election on other grounds, which he does not urge in his brief, and which we do not find worthy of special mention in this opinion. The relators move the court for a judgment in their favor upon the pleadings.

The notice of the special election to authorize the issue of bonds is in fact only a certified copy of the order made by the county court of Mercer county ordering a special election to be held, and is as follows: "Notice of Election. Notice is hereby given that at the regular August term of the county court of Mercer county, Missouri, held at Princeton, Missouri, and on the 10th day of August, 1911, the same being the fourth day of said term, a petition of Edd Kauffman and more than one hundred others of the qualified voters of said county, taxpayers therein, praying for an election to authorize the incurring of an indebtedness for the purpose of building a courthouse, was presented, and the following proceedings were had, to wit: Order calling special election to authorize the issuance of $75,000.00 bonds for the purpose of building a courthouse. Now, on this 10th day of August, the same being the fourth day of the regular August term of the county court of Mercer county, Missouri, comes Edd Kauffman and more than one hundred of the qualified voters of Mercer county, who are taxpayers therein, and present to the court their petition and application, in writing, praying for a special election to authorize the incurring of an indebtedness for the purpose of erecting a courthouse at the city of Princeton, Missouri, in the sum of not exceeding $75,000.00, and to issue bonds for such indebtedness and to levy sufficient taxes to pay the same; and whereas, it has become necessary for Mercer county, Missouri, to incur an indebtedness for the purpose of building a courthouse in excess of the total income and revenue of said county, as provided for in any one year as limited by law: Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered that a special election be held in the county of Mercer and state of Missouri on Tuesday, the third day of October, 1911, for the purpose of authorizing the incurring of said indebtedness, the issuance of said bonds and the levying of such taxes, and that at least twenty days' notice of said election be given by publication in the Princeton Telegraph, the Princeton Post and the Mercer Signal, three several newspapers published in said county of Mercer and state of Missouri; that such special election will be held on Tuesday, the third day of October, 1911; that the amount of the indebtedness shall be the sum of $75,000.00, and that bonds shall be issued therefor. That said bonds shall run for a term of fifteen years, with the option of payment at any time after five years, and shall draw interest at the rate of five per cent. per annum. That the tax levy of Mercer county, Missouri, be increased fifteen cents on the one hundred dollars valuation to pay the interest and provide a sinking fund to retire said bonds. That the purpose of incurring the said indebtedness shall be the building of a courthouse in Princeton, Mercer county, Missouri, and the purpose of this election shall be to authorize the incurring of such indebtedness, the issuance of such bonds and the levying of such additional taxes. C. E. Minter,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Weisgerber v. Nez Perce County
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • April 16, 1921
    ... ... election is void unless notice is given in the manner ... provided by the statute. (State v. Echols, 41 Kan ... 1, 20 P. 523; Guernsey v. McHaley, 52 Ore. 555, 98 ... P. 158; Hatfield v. City of Covington, 177 Ky. 124, 197 S.W ... C. N. S., ... 81; State v. Carroll, 17 R.I. 591, 24 A. 106; ... Demaree v. Johnson, 150 Ind. 419, 49 N.E. 1062, 50 ... N.E. 376; State v. Gordon, 242 Mo. 615, 147 S.W ... 795; Hearn v. Commrs. Blount County, 182 Ala. 392, ... 62 So. 535; Brown v. Street Lighting Dist., 69 ... N.J.L. 485, ... ...
  • State ex rel. City of Berkeley v. Holmes, 41316.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1949
    ... ... Sec. 3306, R.S. 1939; State ex rel. v. Gordon, 268 Mo. 321, 188 S.W. 88. (3) Substantial or approximate compliance with a statute requiring notice of a special election to vote bonds has been upheld by this court, as to preliminary steps leading up to the giving of such notice, but never as to that part of a statute fixing the period of time ... ...
  • State v. Hackman
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1918
    ...540, 576, 31 S. W. 946; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 119 Mo. 383, 24 S. W. 457, 41 Am. St. Rep. 663. In State ex rel. Mercer County et al. v. Gordon, 242 Mo. loc. cit. 624, 147 S. W. 795, we had occasion to make a concrete application of the foregoing canon of construction in discussing like......
  • State ex rel. Marlowe v. Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 16, 1933
    ...borrow the sum of ten thousand dollars for the erection of additional school building." We approve what is said in State ex rel. v. Gordon, 242 Mo. 615, 624, 147 S.W. 795, to-wit: "It is rare indeed that anyone desiring to cast a vote in a special election has any difficulty in finding the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT