State v. Gordon
Decision Date | 20 March 1912 |
Citation | 147 S.W. 795 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. MERCER COUNTY et al. v. GORDON, State Auditor. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
In Banc. Original mandamus proceeding on the relation of Mercer County and others against John P. Gordon, State Auditor. Peremptory writ granted.
E. M. Harber and I. B. Hyde & Son, for relators. Elliott W. Major, Atty. Gen., and Charles G. Revelle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Original action by mandamus in this court to compel respondent, as State Auditor, to register county bonds. On the 3d day of October, 1911, a special election was held in Mercer county, Mo., submitting to the qualified voters of that county a proposition to authorize the issue of $75,000 county bonds to raise money to build a courthouse. At said election, 1,474 votes were cast for and 369 votes against the issue of said bonds. More than two-thirds of the qualified votes cast in said election being in favor of said issue, the county court declared the proposition carried, issued the bonds authorized, and attempted to have the same registered and certified by respondent as Auditor of the State of Missouri. Respondent having refused to register and certify said bonds, this action was instituted on April 22, 1912, to compel him to do so. Respondent has filed his return to the alternative writ issued herein defending his action in refusing to register and certify said bonds, on the following grounds: (1) That the notice of election to authorize the issue of said bonds as published was in fact no notice at all, because it was only a copy of the order made by the county court requiring notice to be given. (2) That the notice of said special election to issue bonds failed to comply with sections 1261 and 1263, R. S. 1909, in that it failed to designate the polling places in Mercer county where said special election was to be held. Respondent also attacks the notice of election on other grounds, which he does not urge in his brief, and which we do not find worthy of special mention in this opinion. The relators move the court for a judgment in their favor upon the pleadings.
The notice of the special election to authorize the issue of bonds is in fact only a certified copy of the order made by the county court of Mercer county ordering a special election to be held, and is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Weisgerber v. Nez Perce County
... ... election is void unless notice is given in the manner ... provided by the statute. (State v. Echols, 41 Kan ... 1, 20 P. 523; Guernsey v. McHaley, 52 Ore. 555, 98 ... P. 158; Hatfield v. City of Covington, 177 Ky. 124, 197 S.W ... C. N. S., ... 81; State v. Carroll, 17 R.I. 591, 24 A. 106; ... Demaree v. Johnson, 150 Ind. 419, 49 N.E. 1062, 50 ... N.E. 376; State v. Gordon, 242 Mo. 615, 147 S.W ... 795; Hearn v. Commrs. Blount County, 182 Ala. 392, ... 62 So. 535; Brown v. Street Lighting Dist., 69 ... N.J.L. 485, ... ...
-
State ex rel. City of Berkeley v. Holmes, 41316.
... ... Sec. 3306, R.S. 1939; State ex rel. v. Gordon, 268 Mo. 321, 188 S.W. 88. (3) Substantial or approximate compliance with a statute requiring notice of a special election to vote bonds has been upheld by this court, as to preliminary steps leading up to the giving of such notice, but never as to that part of a statute fixing the period of time ... ...
-
State v. Hackman
...540, 576, 31 S. W. 946; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 119 Mo. 383, 24 S. W. 457, 41 Am. St. Rep. 663. In State ex rel. Mercer County et al. v. Gordon, 242 Mo. loc. cit. 624, 147 S. W. 795, we had occasion to make a concrete application of the foregoing canon of construction in discussing like......
-
State ex rel. Marlowe v. Lumber Co.
...borrow the sum of ten thousand dollars for the erection of additional school building." We approve what is said in State ex rel. v. Gordon, 242 Mo. 615, 624, 147 S.W. 795, to-wit: "It is rare indeed that anyone desiring to cast a vote in a special election has any difficulty in finding the ......