State v. Gordon
| Decision Date | 17 December 1946 |
| Docket Number | No. 649.,649. |
| Citation | 36 S.E.2d 143,225 N.C. 757 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE. v. GORDON. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Davidson County; Felix E. Alley, Judge.
Grady Gordon was convicted of fornication and adultery, and he appeals.
Judgment reversed.
The defendant was convicted in the Recorder's Court of Denton, on a warrant charging him with fornication and adultery with one Eunice Jordan, and with occupying a building for the purpose of prostitution. The defendant appealed to the Superior Court and was tried de novo.
The evidence offered by the State is substantially as follows: The defendant and his wife lived in a one-room house, about fourteen feet wide and twenty-six feet long. Eunice Jordan and her five children lived in a house about 150 yards from the home of the defendant. The husband of Eunice Jordan is in the Navy. A short time before the defendant was arrested, Eunice Jordan and her five children moved into the home of the defendant. The defendant stated to the officers that the reason Eunice Jordan and her children were living with him, "his wife went and got her and moved her in the house * * * she didn't have any other place to stay." The defendant and Eunice Jordan were seen together a number of times in a cafe in Thomasville and in other public places as well as in private homes. None of the State's witnesses testified to any improper conduct on the part of the defendant and Eunice Jordan on any of these occasions. Sometimes they were accompanied by the defendant's wife.
About 12:30 A.M., on 26 June, 1945, the officers went to the home of the defendant. Some of them testified the room was dark and they could not see anything, but heard the defendant say: "You believe I hugged that woman?" The answer was: "Yes." One officer testified he went around to the east window of the room and saw the defendant in a crouching position over the bed where they found Eunice Jordan, and it "looked like he might have been on his knees, " and that he heard the statement quoted above. When the officers knocked on the door the defendant let them in, and then laid down on a pallet. They found the defendant's wife in one bed, Eunice Jordan and two of her children in another, and defendant and three of the Jordan children on pallets, all in the same room.
At the close of the State's evidence, the defendant moved for judgment as of nonsuit on both counts in the warrant. Motion was allowed on the second count, which charged the defendant with occupying a building for the purpose of prostitution. The defendant offered no evidence.
Verdict: Guilty. Judgment: Imprisonment in the common jail of Davidson County for nine months, to be assigned to do labor under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. The defendant appeals, assigning error.
Harry M. McMullan, Atty. Gen., and Hughes J. Rhodes, Ralph M. Moody, and J. E. Tucker, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.
Phillips & Bower, of Lexington, for defendant.
The question for determination on this appeal is whether the defendant's motion for judgment as of nonsuit should have been sustained as to both counts in the warrant.
It is well settled with us that in passing upon a motion for judgment as of non-suit in criminal prosecutions, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the State, and when so considered the Court must determine whether or not there is any competent evidence to support the allegations in the warrant or bill of indictment. State v. Herndon, 223 N.C, 208, 25 S.E.2d 611; State v. McKinnon, 223 N.C. 160, 25 S.E.2d 606; State v. Todd, 222 N. C. 346, 23 S.E.2d 47; State v. Woodard, 218 N.C. 572, 11 S.E.2d 882; State v. Brown, 218 N.C. 415, 11 S.E.2d 321; State v. Hammonds, 216...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Smith
...terms. E. g.: State v. Kelly, 243 N.C. 177, 90 S.E.2d 241 (1955) ("more than a scintilla of competent evidence"); State v. Gordon, 225 N.C. 757, 36 S.E.2d 143 (1945) ("any competent evidence"); State v. Mann, 219 N.C. 212, 13 S.E.2d 247, 132 A.L.R. 1309 (1941) ("any evidence"); State v. She......
-
State v. Davenport
... ... indictment, it is the duty of the Court to overrule the ... motion and to submit the case to the jury. Moreover, on such ... motion, the State is entitled to the benefit of every ... reasonable inference which may be fairly drawn from the ... evidence. State v. Gordon, 225 N.C. 757, 36 S.E.2d ... 143; State v. Scroggins, 225 N.C. 71, 33 S.E.2d 473; ... State v. Herndon, 223 N.C. 208, 25 S.E.2d 611; ... State v. McKinnon, 223 N.C. 160, 25 S.E.2d 606; ... State v. Johnson, 220 N.C. 773, 18 S.E.2d 358; ... State v. Mann, 219 N.C. 212, 13 S.E.2d 247, ... ...
-
Hardison v. Gregory
...of the second issue to the jury. We have examined the cases of Barker v. Dowdy, 224 N.C. 742, 32 S.E.2d 265, and State v. Gordon, 225 N.C. 757, 36 S.E.2d 143, cited and relied upon by the defendants. In our opinion, the evidence in the present case is stronger. Those cases do not contain da......
-
State v. Church
...both defendants. State v. Gentry, 228 N.C. 643, 644, 46 S.E.2d 863; State v. Davenport, 227 N.C. 475, 42 S.E.2d 686; State v. Gordon, 225 N.C. 757, 36 S.E.2d 143; State v. Scoggins, 225 N.C. 71, 33 S.E.2d State v. McKinnon, 223 N.C. 160, 25 S.E.2d 606; State v. Woodard, 218 N.C. 572, 11 S.E......