State v. Graham

Decision Date26 August 2008
Docket NumberNo. 536P07.,536P07.
Citation666 S.E.2d 765
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Ronald GRAHAM, Jr.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of November 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 5th day of November 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Bass
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 2013
    ...does the acts necessary to constitute the crime pursuant to a common plan or purpose to commit the crime.’ “ State v. Graham, 186 N.C.App. 182, 197, 650 S.E.2d 639, 649 (2007) (quoting State v. Joyner, 297 N.C. 349, 357, 255 S.E.2d 390, 395 (1979)), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied,......
  • State v. Robinson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 5, 2015
    ...resulting in substantial bleeding and inflicting injuries requiring significant medical treatment); see also State v. Graham,186 N.C.App. 182, 195, 650 S.E.2d 639, 648 (2007) (holding that the serious nature and extent of the victim's injuries were sufficient for the trial court to instruct......
  • State v. Coleman, No. COA08-136 (N.C. App. 12/16/2008)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 2008
    ...phase is only admissible if it depicts the context or circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense. State v. Graham, 186 N.C. App. 182, 191, 650 S.E.2d 639, 646 (2007), disc. review denied, appeal dismissed, ___ N.C. ___, 666 S.E.2d 765 (2008). The State concedes that the testimo......
  • State v. Forte
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • August 26, 2008

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT