State v. Gramm
Citation | 52 P. 533,7 Wyo. 329 |
Parties | STATE v. GRAMM ET AL |
Decision Date | 10 March 1898 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming |
RESERVED questions from the District Court for Laramie County, HON. CHARLES W. BRAMEL, Judge of the Second District presiding.
This case was submitted to the district court upon the motions of plaintiff and defendants respectively for judgment upon the pleadings. The suit is brought in the name of and by the State upon the bond given by Otto Gramm, as State treasurer on the 4th day of July, 1893, with Henry G. Balch, Daniel C Bacon, William C. Wilson, Jr., Francis E. Warren, and Thomas A. Kent as sureties. The material allegations of the petition are substantially as follows: That said Otto Gramm was elected to the office of State treasurer, on the 11th day of September, 1890, for a term ending on the 7th day of January 1895; that he entered upon the discharge of the duties of such office on the 7th day of November, 1890, and continuously acted as such officer until January 7, 1895, at which time he was succeeded by Henry G. Hay. He had given a bond upon first assuming the duties of the office, but owing to the death of two of his sureties he gave the bond in suit upon the requirement of the secretary of state; the bond was duly approved. That during his term of office said Gramm had received the sum of $ 44,147.31, which it was his duty to pay over to his successor, but he had failed to make such payment. Judgment is claimed for said amount with interest. All of the defendants except William C. Wilson, Jr., who, it is presumed, was not served with process, appeared and filed an answer admitting the election of said Gramm to the office aforesaid, his entering upon, and continuance in, the discharge of the duties thereof, the execution and approval of the bond; but denying that on January 7, 1895, or at any time thereafter, said Gramm had in his possession the sum of money mentioned in the petition, or any other sum of money belonging to plaintiff, unless the money thereinafter shown to have been deposited in bank be held to have been at that time in his possession. The answer also specifically denies the making of any default in payment to the successor of said Gramm, unless the facts thereinafter set forth constitute such default, and denies the truth of the charge that he did not truly and justly account for all moneys that came into his hands as such treasurer, and alleges that he did honestly, truly, and justly account for all moneys that came into his hands, as such officer, at any time after the giving of the bond sued on. The answer further denies that there was any duty of his office which said Gramm did not faithfully, truly, and justly perform.
The answer then continues with the following which we quote: "And these defendants aver that on the 20th day of July, A. D. 1893, and for many years prior thereto, one Thomas A. Kent was engaged in the general banking business, in the city of Cheyenne, in the county of Laramie, and State of Wyoming, and was of excellent repute and financial standing as a banker in said city of Cheyenne, and throughout the State of Wyoming; that at divers times prior to the said 20th day of July, A. D., 1893, the said Otto Gramm as treasurer of the State of Wyoming, did deposit with and entrust and deliver to the said Thomas A. Kent, doing business as T. A. Kent, banker, as aforesaid, divers sums of money, in the aggregate many thousands of dollars, which said sums of money were of the public funds of the said State of Wyoming, and were in the possession of said Otto Gramm as State treasurer as aforesaid, and were as aforesaid deposited in the said bank conducted by the said Thomas A. Kent, banker, and that at the respective times when each and all of said sums of money were as aforesaid deposited with said Thomas A. Kent, banker, the said public funds and moneys were known by the said banker to be public moneys of the State of Wyoming, and were by him received and held subject to the check and order of the said Otto Gramm as State treasurer, of the State of Wyoming, all of the said deposits being made in the name of Otto Gramm, State treasurer, and being kept entirely separate and distinct from any private funds of the said Otto Gramm, and being so as aforesaid deposited to the sole use and benefit of the said State of Wyoming."
It is further alleged that in January, 1894, the State brought its action for said moneys against the assignee for the benefit of creditors of said Thomas A. Kent; and that the State by authority of the Legislature elected to and did receive dividends from said assigned estate amounting to $ 12,307.39.
The plaintiff filed a reply admitting the lack of negligence or fault on the part of the officer, the reply in that respect being as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Coffin
...v. Mulligan, 113 Cal. 205, 45 P. 337, 33 L. R. A. 463; City of Livingston v. Woods, 20 Mont. 99, 49 P. 437; State v. Gramm, 7 Wyo. 329, 52 P. 533, 40 L. R. A. 698.) & Haga and George M. Parsons, for Defendant. Defendant alleges the fact to be that the act mentioned in the application for a ......
-
State v. Snyder
...judicial power. (Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 127.) The State Treasurer would not incur personal liability in obeying the statute. (State v. Gramm, 7 Wyo. 329; U. S. Realty Co., 163 U.S. 427.) Courts will not consider questions with respect to the constitutionality of a statute unless it is......
-
Wiley v. City Of Sparta, (Nos. 2905, 2913.)
...337, 33 L. R. A. 461; Livingston v. Woods, 20 Mont. 91, 49 Pac. 437; York County v. Watson, 15 S. C. 1, 40 Am. Rep. 675; State v. Gramm, 7 Wyo. 329, 52 Pac. 533, 40 L. R. A. 690; Roberts v. Laramie County, 8 Wyo. 177, 56 Pac. 915; State v. Copeland, 96 Tenn. 296, 34 S. W. 427, 31 L. R. A. 8......
-
City of Casper v. Joyce
...(Mich.) 76 N.W. 499. Joyce did not violate his bond in making said remittances. Neither he nor his bondsman are liable. State v. Gramm, 7 Wyo. 329, 52 P. 533. Roberts v. County, 8 Wyo. 177, 56 P. Commonwealth v. Polk (Ky.) 722 S.W.2d 761. State v. Copeland (Tenn.) 34 S.W. 427. City of Heald......