State v. Hager

Decision Date06 June 1887
Citation92 Mo. 511,4 S.W. 925
PartiesSTATE ex rel. CRAMER v. HAGER and others.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

BRACE, J.

This is a proceeding by injunction, instituted by the respondent as prosecuting attorney of Cape Girardeau county, against the appellants, judges of the county court of said county, seeking to restrain said judges from levying taxes upon the property of the tax-payers of Cape Girardeau township, in said county, to pay the interest on certain bonds issued by said county in behalf of said township in aid of the Cape Girardeau & State Line Railway, by virtue of an act of the general assembly of the state of Missouri approved March 23, 1868, generally known as the "Township Aid Act." A temporary injunction was granted by the judge of the circuit court in vacation. The appellants appeared, filed their answer, denying each and every allegation contained in the petition, and the case, coming on to be heard on their motion to dissolve the injunction, was submitted to the court upon the following agreed statement of facts:

"It is hereby agreed by and between the parties plaintiff and defendant in this cause that the same shall be submitted to the court upon the following agreed statement of facts, which, it is believed, embraces all matters material to either party:

"(1) That Maurice Cramer is the prosecuting attorney of Cape Girardeau county, Missouri.

"(2) That William Hager, Samuel Hitt, and Robert M. Snider are the judges of the county court of said county.

"(3) That in the year 1869, under the provisions of an act of the general assembly of the state of Missouri entitled `An act to facilitate the construction of railroads in the state of Missouri,' approved March 23, 1868, the county court of Cape Girardeau county, for and in behalf of the township of Cape Girardeau, in said county, subscribed $150,000 to the capital stock of the Cape Girardeau & State Line Railroad Company, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, and afterwards issued bonds in that sum, with interest coupons attached, running twenty years, and bearing eight per cent interest.

"(4) That the said bonds so issued by said county court are yet outstanding and unpaid.

"(...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1929
    ... ... species of property higher than others and higher than the ... average rate, a court of equity will grant appropriate ... relief. State ex rel. Gottlieb v. Telegraph Co., 165 ... Mo. 502; Terminal Co. v. Koeln, 8 S.W.2d 1025; ... Jefferson City Bridge Co. v. Blaser, 300 S.W ... 496; Railway Co. v. Gracy, 126 Mo. 472; Hamilton ... v. Rosenblatt, 8 Mo.App. 237; State ex rel. Cramer ... v. Hager, 92 Mo. 511; Dean v. Todd, 22 Mo. 90; ... National Bank v. Meredith, 44 Mo. 500; McPike v ... Pew, 48 Mo. 525. (7) The action of the ... ...
  • Hatton v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 24, 1913
    ... ... being insufficient to constitute a cause of action. (a) ... Pattison Code Pleading (2 Ed.), sec. 519; State ex rel ... v. Wood, 155 Mo. 446; Brake Beam Co. v ... Bakewell, 224 Mo. 222; Missouri Code Pleading, Pattison ... (2 Ed.), sec. 536. (b) ... 37; Towne v. Bowers, 81 Mo ... 496; Turner v. Stewart, 78 Mo. 408; Bank v ... Kercheval, 65 Mo. 688; State ex rel. v. Hager, ... 92 Mo. 511, 4 S.W. 925; Owen v. Ford, 49 Mo. 437; ... Brewing Co. v. Water Works Co., 34 Mo.App. 54.] ...          The ... ...
  • Hatton v. Kansas City, C. & S. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 24, 1913
    ...Mo. loc. cit. 496; Turner v. Stewart, 78 Mo. loc. cit. 480; Bank v. Kercheval, 65 Mo. loc. cit. 688, 27 Am. Rep. 310; Cramer v. Hager, 92 Mo. loc. cit. 513, 4 S. W. 925; Owen v. Ford, 49 Mo. loc. cit. 457; Brewing Co. v. Water Works Co., 34 Mo. App. loc. cit. The paragraph of the petition, ......
  • State v. Hager
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1887

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT