State v. Hammonds, 65A01.

Decision Date09 November 2001
Docket NumberNo. 65A01.,65A01.
Citation554 S.E.2d 645
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Jakie HAMMONDS.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Roy A. Cooper, Attorney General, by Steven M. Arbogast, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Staples Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Janet Moore, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.

American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, Inc., by Seth H. Jaffe, Raleigh, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • State v. Berryman
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • January 27, 2006
    ...Carolina or United States Supreme Court precedent recognizing a constitutional right to a speedy appeal), aff'd per curiam, 354 N.C. 353, 554 S.E.2d 645 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907, 122 S.Ct. 2363, 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002); State v. Shoff, 118 N.C.App. 724, 725, 456 S.E.2d 876 (1995) (......
  • State v. Spinks
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 18, 2021
    ...he was prejudiced by the delay. State v. Hammonds , 141 N.C. App. 152, 163, 541 S.E.2d 166, 175 (2000), aff'd per curiam , 354 N.C. 353, 554 S.E.2d 645 (2001), cert. denied , 536 U.S. 907, 122 S.Ct. 2363, 153 L. Ed. 2d 184 (2002). "A defendant must show actual, substantial prejudice." Spive......
  • State v. Spivey
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 2, 2003
    ...majority in the Court of Appeals concluded that State v. Hammonds, 141 N.C.App. 152, 541 S.E.2d 166 (2000),aff'd per curiam, 354 N.C. 353, 554 S.E.2d 645 (2001),cert, denied, 536 U.S. 907, 122 S.Ct. 2363, 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002) was controlling. Spivey, 150 N.C.App. at 190,563 S.E.2d at 12. ......
  • State v. Rollins
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 18, 2008
    ...Freeman, 302 N.C. 591, 596, 276 S.E.2d 450, 453 (1981)), disc. review denied, 353 N.C. 529, 549 S.E.2d 860, aff'd per curiam, 354 N.C. 353, 554 S.E.2d 645 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907, 122 S.Ct. 2363, 153 L.Ed.2d 184 (2002). This holding allows marriage partners to speak freely to eac......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT