State v. Harding
Decision Date | 13 December 1927 |
Docket Number | 38593 |
Citation | 216 N.W. 642,204 Iowa 1135 |
Parties | STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, v. BROY HARDING, Appellant |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Harrison District Court.--J. S. DEWELL, Judge.
A county attorney's information was filed against the defendant and his brother, David Harding, charging them with entering the premises of the Modale Savings Bank, with intent to rob said bank. The defendant, Broy Harding, entered a plea of not guilty, and was granted a separate trial. From a judgment of conviction upon a verdict of guilty the defendant, Broy Harding, appeals.
Affirmed.
William P. Welch, for appellant.
John Fletcher, Attorney-general, Neill Garrett, Assistant Attorney-general, Roy Havens, County Attorney, and C. W Kellogg, for appellee.
WAGNER J. EVANS, C. J., and DE GRAFF, ALBERT, and MORLING, JJ concur.
The record in this case is a revelation of one of the most daring holdups ever perpetrated within the confines of our state. About 9:30 A. M. on the 15th day of December, 1926, two bandits, well armed, entered the front door of the Modale Savings Bank. There were at that time behind the counter in the bank the cashier and another employee, and two citizens outside the railing. The bandits wore false mustaches, Scotch caps, and handkerchiefs around their necks, in such manner as by the use thereof they could cover the lower portion of their faces. As they entered the bank, with their revolvers drawn, there came from them such exclamations as "Stick 'em up." "No fooling." "We mean business." "We want your money." The cashier, Sassaman, replied, "No, no, you cannot have it;" and one of the bandits immediately shot him in the head, though not fatally, but the injury was sufficient to cause him to fall to the floor. The other employee of the bank started out of the back door, when one of the bandits shot at him; but the bullet passed over his head, and he escaped. The two bandits passed behind the counter, obtained possession of the gun there kept for the protection of the employees, and at the point of revolvers commanded the wounded cashier to open the safe, threatening to kill him if he refused. The cashier complied with their command. The bandits obtained money of various denominations in a sum in excess of $ 4,000, and then backed the cashier and others into the vault, and escaped out of the front door, shooting one Jackson in the leg as he passed along the street, and jumped into a Ford car, fully curtained,--except the right front curtain,--and made their escape. They went south a mile or a mile and a quarter, and then turned west. Two citizens pursued them to the corner, and where the bandits turned west, they turned east, and arrived at California Junction by a different route; and somewhere along the road they discovered tracks that turned off into the brush near Blair Bridge, and, following the track for a mile and a half, they came to a shack. They saw a car pull away from the shack, going south. At the shack they found some empty cartridges and false mustaches. These two parties then went to a farmhouse and called the Modale authorities. They then returned to the shack and pursued the track down the river about three and one-half or four miles, where they found a car which had been burned, with a hole in the gasoline tank.
According to the record, this was the last seen of the bandits, or those thought to be the bandits, until that same afternoon, about 4 o'clock, when, at a house conducted by Mrs. Wilson, at 1713 California Street, Omaha, some of the police officers of Omaha and the sheriff of Pottawattamie County, Iowa, arrested the defendant and his brother, David Harding, who were suspected to be the bandits. It appears that the officers and the two Hardings arrived at this place about the same time. The Hardings came there in a taxicab, and shortly after they went into the house, the officers entered, and the defendant attempted to escape, but was captured. His brother, Dave, was pretty well intoxicated at the time, and started to scuffle with one of the officers, who pushed him against the frame of the door, and felt him for a gun; and a considerable sum of money was found on Dave's person at that time. The sum of $ 22 was found on the person of the defendant; and under the mattress on a bed in a room which the lady who conducted the house said, in the presence of the Hardings, was the room of the defendant and his brother, a large sum of money was found, a portion of which was identified as money taken from the Modale Savings Bank. The defendant and his brother were taken to the police station, and that evening the defendant made a confession, and the next morning, his brother, Dave, made a confession, and the defendant at that time signed a second confession.
It is shown by the record that Louise Hitchings, a witness for the State, was proprietress of a cafe in Missouri Valley, and that, while she was in the cafe on the evening of December 14th (the night before the robbery), she saw the defendant in her restaurant with another man, who put in a long distance call for 1960 Jackson, Omaha; and she heard the man ask over the telephone whether Mrs. Harding was there, and heard him also say: It is also shown by the record that a Ford car was stolen from the streets of Omaha on the evening of the 14th of December, and that the car hereinbefore mentioned as being burned at the river, on the morning of the 15th, bore the number plate of said car.
The first confession of the defendant hereinbefore referred to, which was obtained on the evening of December 15th, was signed by him, and was witnessed by the sheriff of Pottawattamie County and Harry H. Rubenstein, a reporter of the "Omaha Daily New," and several others. The second confession of the defendant was signed by him, and witnessed by William A. Gurnett (a police officer), Harry H. Rubenstein, as aforesaid, and two others. The voluntary character of the confessions is established by the testimony of Rubenstein, the police officers, and the sheriff. The confessions were by questions and answers. In the first confession, after stating his name, place of residence, age, and occupation, he was asked:
He then answered questions, the answers to which we give in abstract form, as follows:
In the second confession, obtained on the morning of December 16th, appeared the following:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Sampson
...475, 22 N.W.2d 222, we said: 'The rule is well established that errors assigned which are not argued are deemed waived. State v. Harding, 204 Iowa 1135, 216 N.W. 642; State v. Neifert, 206 Iowa 384, 220 N.W. 32.' In State v. Neifert, supra, we stated: 'Errors which are relied upon for rever......
-
State v. Wood, 50390
...N.W.2d 222, we said: 'The rule is well established that errors assigned which are not argued are deemed waived.' See also State v. Harding, 204 Iowa 1135, 216 N.W. 642; State v. Neifert, 206 Iowa 384, 220 N.W. 32; State v. Sampson, The case is affirmed. Affirmed. All Justices concur except ......
- State v. Harding