State v. Hardy, KCD
| Decision Date | 27 February 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. KCD,KCD |
| Citation | 578 S.W.2d 361 |
| Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Claude M. HARDY, Appellant. 29221. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
The defendant herein prosecuted his appeal to this Court from a conviction of Kidnapping and Rape, which judgment was affirmed by decision of this Court on June 12, 1978 and our mandate issued July 25, 1978. State v. Hardy, 568 S.W.2d 86. In so doing, this Court followed the binding authority of State v. Duren, 556 S.W.2d 11 (Mo. banc 1977) which ruled the Missouri jury selection statutes as they pertained to the exclusion of women from jury service to be constitutional. The Missouri decision in Duren was thereafter held to be unconstitutional and void by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Duren v. State of Missouri, 1979, 439 U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 664, 58 L.Ed.2d 579.
The Supreme Court of the United States granted a writ of certiorari to the defendant here and thereafter that proceeding in the Supreme Court was numbered 78-5606, Hardy v. State of Missouri, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 1037, 59 L.Ed.2d 85.
This Court has received from the Supreme Court of the United States its mandate dated February 20, 1978 in the above entitled cause No. KCD 29,221, ordering that the judgment of this Court in this case be vacated and remanding the same for reconsideration by this Court in the light of Duren v. Missouri, supra, and directing this Court to take such proceedings herein in conformity with such opinion in Duren as will accord with right and justice and the Constitution and Laws of the United States.
It appears from the record in this case that the defendant, Claude M. Hardy, raised the constitutional question as to jury selection laws in Missouri pertaining to women, decided in Duren v. Missouri, by moving to quash the jury panel in his criminal trial at the earliest possible time and preserved the question throughout the criminal trial and appeal to this Court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, CONSIDERED AND ADJUDGED That our decision herein of June 12, 1978, and our mandate herein of July 25, 1978, be and the same are hereby withdrawn and this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED That the defendant, Claude M. Hardy, be transported from his present place of confinement by the Department of Corrections of the State of Missouri to the Jackson County, Missouri jail at Kansas City, Missouri...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Benson v. State
...in compliance with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States. State v. Clark, 583 S.W.2d 300 (Mo.App.1979); State v. Hardy, 578 S.W.2d 361 (Mo.App.1979). Varieties of procedural default began to emerge in the appeals of other cases. State v. Buford, 582 S.W.2d 298 (Mo.App.1979),......
-
State v. Nevels, KCD
...the jury was clouded by the unconstitutional methods employed in jury selection as it pertained to the service of women. State v. Hardy, 578 S.W.2d 361 (Mo.App. 1979); State v. Brown, 577 S.W.2d 163 (Mo.App.1979); State v. Arrington, No. 59,669 (Mo. banc March 15, 1979); State v. Madison, N......
-
State v. McReynolds
...the jury was clouded by the unconstitutional methods employed in jury selection as it pertained to the service of women. State v. Hardy, 578 S.W.2d 361 (1979); State v. Brown, 577 S.W.2d 163 (1979); State v. Arrington, 559 S.W.2d 749 (1979); State v. Madison, No. KCD 29,639 (February 26, 19......
-
State v. Clark, KCD
...the jury was clouded by the unconstitutional methods employed in jury selection as it pertained to the service of women. State v. Hardy, 578 S.W.2d 361 (1979); State v. Brown, 577 S.W.2d 163 (1979); State v. Arrington, No. 59,699 (Mo. banc, March 15, 1979); State v. Madison, No. KCD 29,639 ......