State v. Harris, 483A89

Decision Date10 May 1990
Docket NumberNo. 483A89,483A89
Citation391 S.E.2d 187,326 N.C. 588
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Sterling Payton HARRIS Alias Davy Ray Bolder.

Appeal of right by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(1) (1989) from a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals reported at 95 N.C.App. 691, 384 S.E.2d 50 (1989), affirming a judgment of imprisonment entered by Helms, J., on 7 July 1988 in Superior Court, Guilford County, upon defendant's plea of guilty to the felony of possession of a firearm by a felon, entered after the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Defendant preserved his right to appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-979(b) (1988). Heard in the Supreme Court 11 April 1990.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen., by George W. Boylan, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Frederick G. Lind, Asst. Public Defender, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Beveridge
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 7, 1993
    ...603, appeal dismissed, 283 N.C. 670, 197 S.E.2d 879 (1973); State v. Harris, 95 N.C.App. 691, 384 S.E.2d 50 (1989), aff'd, 326 N.C. 588, 391 S.E.2d 187 (1990). However, in Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032, 103 S.Ct. 3469, 77 L.Ed.2d 1201 (1983), the United States Supreme Court held that "if,......
  • State v. Whittenburg
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 2004
    ...delineations between a "frisk" and a "search." State v. Harris, 95 N.C. App. 691, 696, 384 S.E.2d 50, 52-53 (1989), aff'd, 326 N.C. 588, 391 S.E.2d 187 (1990). In Terry, the Court created a narrow exception to the probable cause requirement for a search which allows a law enforcement office......
  • Moore v. Morton
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • April 2, 1992
    ...requirement of reasonableness. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 16 (1968); State v. Harris, 384 S.E.2d 50, 53 (N.C.App.1989), aff'd, 391 S.E.2d 187 (N.C.1990). If the conduct of Deputy Morton amounted to a full seizure/arrest, a higher standard would apply. Under either the fourth amendment o......
  • Signalife, Inc. v. Rubbermaid, Inc., COA08-496.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • October 21, 2008
    ... ... Trials were set for September 2008 in federal court and February 2009 in state court. On or after 8 February 2008, a special superior court judge granted defendants' motion to ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT