State v. Hawley
Decision Date | 04 June 1948 |
Docket Number | 723 |
Citation | 48 S.E.2d 35,229 N.C. 167 |
Parties | STATE v. HAWLEY. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Criminal prosecution upon bill of indictment charging defendant with the offense of murder in the first degree of one Effie Hawley, at and in Granville County, on 29 September, 1947.
The record on this appeal shows that defendant, upon arraignment pleaded not guilty. It contains also case on appeal served by defendant through his attorneys, to which the solicitor for the State agreed.
This case on appeal presents these salient facts: On the trial below the State offered evidence tending to support the charge of murder in the first degree with which defendant stands indicted. The defendant offered no evidence, and his counsel had and made the opening and concluding arguments to the jury. In the meantime, arguments were made by attorneys for private prosecution, followed by the solicitor for the State.
The substance of the concluding part of the solicitor's argument to the jury as shown in the case on appeal, to which the solicitor agrees and to which exception by defendant appears, is as follows:
Counsel for defendant, who followed the solicitor, replied to the above argument. And it is stated that .
Verdict: Guilty of murder in the first degree.
Judgment: Death by administration of lethal gas.
Defendant appeals therefrom to Supreme Court, and assigns error.
Harry M. McMullen, Atty. Gen., and T. W. Bruton, Hughes J. Rhodes and Ralph M. Moody, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.
T. G. Stem and B. S. Royster, Jr. both of Oxford, for defendant-appellant.
The remarks of the solicitor for the State in concluding his address to the jury on the trial in Superior Court, to which alone exception is directed on this appeal, are to the same effect as those held by this Court in the case State v Little, 228 N.C. 417, 45 S.E.2d 542, to be calculated to prejudice unduly the defendant in the defense of the charge against him, and on account of which a new trial was ordered. There, as here, the defendant was on trial charged with murder in the first degree. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial