State v. Head
Decision Date | 04 January 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 363.,363. |
Citation | 200 S.E. 415,214 N.C. 700 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE. v. HEAD. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Alexander County; Frank S. Hill, Special Judge.
Clarence Head was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, and he appeals. No error.
Upon the call of the case for trial, the solicitor announced that he would not ask for a verdict of murder in the first degree, but would ask for verdict of murder in second degree or manslaughter as the evidence justified.
The uncontroverted facts are substantially these: On October 9, 1937, Glady Lackey, age 18 years, son of Robey Lackey and his wife, Stella Lackey, was shot and killed by a gun in the hands of defendant, aged 37 years, his first cousin. The shooting occurred on the back porch of the home of Robey Lackey, where Glady and his mother were standing, --the defendant being on the ground. Robey Lackey and Glady Lackey and defendant were and at all times prior thereto had been good friends.
The State offered as an eye witness Mrs. Stella Lackey, who testified in substance that: She sent Glady to the barn for some eggs. When he returned and was in the act of delivering the eggs to her, defendant, who was standing on the ground with his single barreled gun under his right arm, barrel pointing down, raised the gun, pointing the barrel towards Glady, and then the gun fired, the load striking Glady in his left side under the arm. She said: . On cross examination she testified:
Defendant, in his own behalf, testified that he lives at Hanes near Winston Salem. On the morning of October 9, 1937, he, with his wife and two children, drove to the home of his father. From there he went up on the mountain squirrel hunting. In returning he went to the home of his uncle, Robey Lackey. As he passed the barn he saw Glady, the deceased, and walked and talked with him going to the house. On arriving at the house, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Honeycutt
...record that tends to show the defendant intentionally pointed the gun in the direction of the deceased, as was the case in State v. Head, 214 N.C. 700, 200 S.E. 415. In the case of State v. Satterfield, 198 N.C. 682, 153 S.E. 155, 156, in speaking of involuntary manslaughter, this Court sai......
-
Carolina Transp. & v. Am. Alliance Ins. Co
... ... (rugs) of the value of $3,197.10 at Philadelphia and Trenton to be carried to High Point, (6) while carrying said shipment through the State of Maryland, the truck upon which the cargo was loaded was wrecked on November 21, 1931, and the driver of the truck was compelled to leave it to ... ...
-
Carolina Transportation & Distributing Co. v. American Alliance Ins. Co.
... ... and Trenton to be carried to High Point, (6) while carrying ... said shipment through the State of Maryland, the truck upon ... which the cargo was loaded was wrecked on November 21, 1931, ... and the driver of the truck was compelled to leave ... ...
-
State v. Holshouser, 7219SC508
...me', standing alone, is not sufficient to raise an inference that the defendant intentionally pointed the weapon at her, State v. Head, 214 N.C. 700, 200 S.E. 415 (1939), or that he handled it in such a careless and reckless manner as to amount to culpable negligence. State v. Honeycutt, On......