State v. Hearl

Decision Date12 September 2018
Citation330 Conn. 903,192 A.3d 425 (Table)
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
Parties STATE of Connecticut v. Michael A. HEARL

Jon L. Schoenhorn, in support of the petition.

Gregory L. Borrelli, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 182 Conn. App. 237, 190 A.3d 42 (2018), is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Ruiz-Pacheco
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 9 d4 Julho d4 2020
    ...State v. Hearl , 182 Conn. App. 237, 272–73, 190 A.3d 42 (unit of prosecution for animal cruelty statute), cert. denied, 330 Conn. 903, 192 A.3d 425 (2018). The unit of prosecution analysis involves an effort to determine the legislature's intent as to whether and how a course of prohibited......
  • State v. Grasso
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 9 d2 Abril d2 2019
    ...we deem that aspect of her claim to be abandoned. See State v. Hearl , 182 Conn. App. 237, 271 n.28, 190 A.3d 42, cert. denied, 330 Conn. 903, 192 A.3d 425 (2018).28 Pursuant to Golding , a defendant may prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all four of t......
  • State v. Dawson
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 19 d2 Março d2 2019
    ...folded into a claim of prosecutorial impropriety. See State v. Hearl , 182 Conn. App. 237, 253 n.18, 190 A.3d 42, cert. denied, 330 Conn. 903, 192 A.3d 425 (2018).The defendant also criticizes the trial court for not issuing a curative instruction for the prosecutor's alleged misstatement o......
  • State v. Mitchell
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 11 d2 Fevereiro d2 2020
    ...than that afforded by its federal counterpart." State v. Hearl , 182 Conn. App. 237, 271 n.28, 190 A.3d 42, cert. denied, 330 Conn. 903, 192 A.3d 425 (2018). On appeal, the defendant has not provided this court with an independent state constitutional analysis in accordance with State v. Ge......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT