State v. Henderson

Decision Date31 January 1852
CitationState v. Henderson, 15 Mo. 486 (Mo. 1852)
CourtMissouri Supreme Court
PartiesTHE STATE v. HENDERSON & POWERS.

ERROR TO NEWTON CIRCUIT COURT.

GARDENHIRE, Attorney-General, for The State, cited: 18th section of 5th article of act concerning Crimes and Punishments, Rev. Stat. 381: 3 Chitty's Cr. L. 831; 2 ibid. 144-5, note a, in which it is said that it is not necessary to state that the party to be arrested was guilty of any offense or owed any debt, or that any affidavit of debt was made. 3 Term R. 185.

RYLAND, J.

The defendants, John Henderson and Joseph Powers, were indicted at the April term, 1850, of the Circuit Court for the county of Newton, for opposing the execution of civil process. The defendants entered their appearance to the indictment, and moved the court to quash it. This motion the court sustained, and the State, by the circuit attorney, excepted, filed her bill of exceptions and brings the case here by writ of error. The sufficiency of the indictment is the only point before us. This indictment alleges “that John Henderson and Joseph Powers, late of said county, heretofore, to-wit: on the 28th day of October, A. D. 1849, at the county of Newton and State of Missouri, with force and arms did then and there unlawfully, knowingly and willfully oppose one Isaac Gibson, a constable of Neosho township, Newton county, Missouri, in his official duties as such; to-wit: in the execution of a writ of attachment issued by one Mark A. Garrison, a justice of the peace for said county and township, against the property of one James Boyd, in favor of one Lemuel Heanell, contrary,” &c.

This indictment is framed under the 18th section, 5th article of the act concerning Crimes and Punishments, Digest 1845, which declares “if any person or persons shall knowingly and willfully obstruct, resist or oppose any sheriff, or any other...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • The State v. Rowlen
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 14, 1893
    ...same instrument. The mortgage must be set out in the indictment to inform the court of the legal effect of a release of the same. State v. Henderson, 15 Mo. 486. (2) The court should have sustained the demurrer to the evidence. The said real estate being in the state of Kansas, delivery of ......
  • State v. Estis
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1879
    ...between the warrant as set out and as proven, are fatal. Rex v. Beech, 1 Leach Cr. C. 158; 1 Bishop Crim. Proced., § 311; State v. Henderson, 15 Mo. 486. 3. The court erred in refusing to allow witness Smith Story to answer question in regard to previous threats of parties against defendant......
  • State v. Ostmann
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 11, 1906
    ...as was done in the present instance, in order that the court may see if it was of a kind the officer had a right to execute. State v. Henderson, 15 Mo. 486. The information in all its charging clauses speaks of the process as an execution, and appellants insist those averments were so repug......
  • State v. Ostmann
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 11, 1906
    ...as was done in the present instance, in order that the court may see if it was a kind the officer had a right to execute. [State v. Henderson, 15 Mo. 486.] information in all its charging clauses speaks of the process as an execution, and appellants insist these averments were so repugnant ......
  • Get Started for Free