State v. Henning, 58292

Decision Date18 February 1976
Docket NumberNo. 58292,58292
Citation238 N.W.2d 783
PartiesSTATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Virgil G. HENNING, Appellant.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Mike Wilson, Des Moines, for appellant.

Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., Thomas D. McGrane, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Kenneth Whitehead, Jasper County Atty., for appellee.

Submitted to MOORE, C.J., and RAWLINGS, UHLENHOPP, REYNOLDSON and McCORMICK, JJ.

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

This appeal involves two rulings by the trial court in a trial of a charge of delivery of a controlled substance, amphetamine.

The Jasper Assistant County Attorney charged defendant Virgil G. Henning with delivery of amphetamine. Code 1975, § 204.401(1)(b). Defendant pleaded not guilty. Upon trial, a jury found him guilty and the trial court passed sentence. Defendant appealed.

Defendant contends here that the trial court erred (1) in admitting testimony regarding the conversation which occurred at the time of the alleged delivery, and (2) in holding the evidence sufficient for submission of the case to the jury.

The testimony regarding delivery was quite extensive. Acting on prior information, undercover officers went to Kellogg, Iowa. Officer Forrest Davenport entered the Ma & Pa Tap there, where he first talked with a waitress, Marcia Allspach, about buying 1000 'crosses.' These are amphetamine tablets, called crosses, cross-roads, L.A. turnarounds, or speed. The waitress nodded affirmatively and demanded 20 cents apiece for the pills.

Defendant became involved in the conversation when the waitress left to wait on a customer. Officer Davenport testified regarding defendant:

He asked me if I wanted the 1000 crosses. He stated that Marcia was his first cousin and that things were cool there, and he stated the price was 20 cents each. I asked him, 'If I bought in larger quantities could I get a cheaper price.' He said, 'It doesn't make any difference how much you buy, the price is 20 cents apiece.' He mentioned the fact that he could get me 5000 right now, but the price would still be 20 cents apiece. Then I asked him about his connection. He mentioned the fact that his connection was in Minnesota. We had some further conversation that he was planning to go to Minnesota to set up a tavern or something like that. I asked then if I could maybe buy larger quantities, and he again mentioned the price of 20 cents. I confronted him maybe I can buy into your connection, pay money and buy into your connection . . ..

While questioning him, asking him about buying into his connection, he stated 'Do you have enough money to buy into the syndicate?' To this I replied, 'No, but I would like to buy in larger quantities and get a cheaper price.' He then said, 'Do you want the 1000 or do you want more?' I mentioned that, 'Well, I will take just the 1000, that is $200.00.' I said that if I get burned, which is referring to that they are nothing. A burn is something that they report it is which it isn't. It is not amphetamines. It is not speed. Anyway, I referred to that if I got burned that he just wouldn't see me again . . ..

He stated to just ask anybody in the Newton area and the Kellogg area and they would tell you that Virgil Henning's stuff--and this is when I first learned of his name--is good. He said, 'I don't sell bad stuff, it is not good business.'

The conversation continued at some length. The officer eventually agreed to buy 1000 crosses from defendant and paid defendant $200 for them, and defendant got the pills and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. Watson
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1976
    ...complaints objecting to testimony that defendant brandished a knife out of the car window as Six was pursuing them. See State v. Henning, 238 N.W.2d 783, 785 (Iowa 1976); State v. Pilcher, 242 N.W.2d 367 (Iowa 1976); State v. Hinkle, 229 N.W.2d 744, 748 (Iowa 1975); State v. Oppedal, supra,......
  • State v. Pilcher
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • May 19, 1976
    ...State v. Lyons, 210 N.W.2d 543, 546 (Iowa 1973) * * *' See also State v. Fryer, Iowa, 243 N.W.2d 1, filed May 19, 1976; State v. Henning, 238 N.W.2d 783, 785 (Iowa 1976); State v. Hinkle, 229 N.W.2d 744, 748--749 (Iowa 1975); 22A C.J.S. Criminal Law § 603, page 409 This leaves for considera......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT