State v. Hesterly
Decision Date | 17 November 1903 |
Citation | 76 S.W. 985,178 Mo. 43 |
Parties | THE STATE v. HESTERLY, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Howell Circuit Court. -- Hon Argus Cox, Special Judge.
Cause remanded (with directions).
Green & Clark for appellant.
Edward C. Crow, Attorney-General, and C. D. Corum for the State.
OPINION
At the January term, 1903, of the Howell Circuit Court, the prosecuting attorney of said county filed against appellant his information consisting of two counts; the first charging him with carnally knowing one Anna Byers, an unmarried female of the age of sixteen years, of previous chaste character and the second count charging him with defiling the said Anna Byers while she was confided to the care and custody of appellant as a pupil in the school of which appellant was the teacher.
The cause coming on for trial on the 24th day of March, 1903 before Hon. Argus Cox, judge of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, sitting as special judge, with a jury, defendant, appellant herein, filed his application for a continuance, to which the prosecuting attorney filed his counter-affidavit, and appellant filed his rejoinder, thereto. The application for continuance was overruled.
Whereupon, the State entered a nolle prosequi to the first count in the information. The defendant was then arraigned on the second count in the information and entered a plea of not guilty thereto. A trial was held which resulted in a verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty and assessing his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years. To reverse the judgment and sentence defendant, appellant herein, brings the cause to this court on appeal.
The amended information upon which defendant was tried, omitting caption, is as follows:
It will be observed that the defendant was convicted upon the second count of the information.
The following verdict was returned by the jury: "We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged, and assess his punishment at five years in the penitentiary."
The State having dismissed as to the first count in the information, there was left only one charge upon which the defendant was tried and convicted. The verdict of the jury was correct in form, when they say "guilty, as charged;" it could only have application to the only remaining charge against him, as contained in the second count of the information.
The judgment rendered in this cause is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial