State v. Higgins, 82-2418

Decision Date10 August 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-2418,82-2418
Citation437 So.2d 180
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James HIGGINS, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard R. Haas, Pompano Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from dismissal of an information charging appellee with grand theft. We reverse.

1. The motion to dismiss was sworn to by counsel rather than by appellee, in contravention of Rule 3.190(c)(4), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure;

2. The state was not afforded sufficient notice of the hearing on the motion to dismiss;

3. The oral traverse of the state should have been accepted;

4. Since the facts set forth in the motion to dismiss are consistent with appellee's guilt, no traverse, either written or oral, was necessary; and

5. Fair market value of stolen goods is the retail value regardless of whether the owner-victim had purchased them at wholesale. Negron v. State, 306 So.2d 104 (Fla.1975).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LETTS, HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Shell v. State, 03-DP-0087
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 29, 1989
  • State v. Paleveda, 98-05003.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 20, 1999
    ...State v. Gale, 575 So.2d 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see also State v. Yarborough, 571 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); State v. Higgins, 437 So.2d 180 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); State v. Alford, 395 So.2d 201 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). If the facts alleged in the motion establish a prima facie case, the moti......
  • State v. SCM Glidco Organics Corp., s. 89-2465
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 23, 1991
    ...traverse filed, the dismissal of the counts to which this defense was directed was proper. We note that the opinion in State v. Higgins, 437 So.2d 180 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), which is cited by the state in support of its claim that its oral traverse at the time of the hearing should have been ......
  • State v. Pizzagalli, 90-2096
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 26, 1991
    ...Accord State v. Sawyer, 526 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). See also State v. Yarborough, 571 So.2d 17 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); State v. Higgins, 437 So.2d 180 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 450 So.2d 486 We reverse and remand with directions to permit the state to file a traverse with hearing on......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT