State v. Hill
| Decision Date | 20 May 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 0520,0520 |
| Court | South Carolina Court of Appeals |
| Parties | The STATE, Respondent, v. Raymond W. HILL, Jr., Appellant. . Heard |
H. Michael Spivey and Susan L. Pringle, Mauldin, for appellant.
Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Atty. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Staff
Atty. Amie L. Clifford, Columbia; and Sol. William B. Traxler, Jr., Greenville, for respondent.
Appellant Raymond W. Hill, Jr. was charged by grand jury with six counts of failure to pay materialmen for materials furnished in erection of a building, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. §§ 29-7-10, 29-7-20 (1976 & Supp.1984). At hearings on motions to quash and amend the indictment, Hill argued in his place, his business should be charged, for his actions were taken on behalf of, and in his capacity as officer and director of, the corporation. The circuit court denied the motions and, following a bench trial, entered judgment of guilty. Hill appeals denial of the motions. We affirm.
When a legal non-jury action is appealed, "findings of fact of the judge will not be disturbed ... unless found to be without evidence ... reasonably" supporting them. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S.C. 81, 221 S.E.2d 773, 775 (1976).
In 1979 Hill and his spouse incorporated Design Dimensions, Ltd. for the general purpose of developing and improving real property. The Hills elected themselves directors and Hill president and treasurer. The corporation issued 700 shares, 400 to Hill. The circuit court found Hill was solely responsible for day to day operations of the business.
In late 1981 Design Dimensions and the William B. Cummings contracted for construction of a residence. In early 1982 Cummings learned although he had given Design Dimensions $65,000 in advances, Hill had failed to pay several materialmen. When Cummings asked for an accounting, Hill refused, stating the contract did not require an accounting. The court found in other respects Hill's "conduct [and] attitude is simply incredulous [sic]." At trial Hill produced cancelled checks for the Cummings job for only $44,363.72. The court found Hill had deposited checks written by Cummings with his own funds and charged personal expenses to Cummings' account. In late 1982 Design Dimensions filed a petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 701-766.
We agree with the reasoning of the circuit court in denying the motions to quash and amend the indictment: when a person causes a corporation to commit a crime, he cannot invoke the existence of the corporation to shield him from prosecution.
Neither the Supreme Court nor this court have faced the question of personal liability of officers and directors of corporations as agents for criminal activity committed on behalf of the entity. Cf. Charleston Oil Co. v. Poulnot, 143 S.C. 283, 141 S.E. 454, 459 (1928) (); Sturkie v. Sifly, 280 S.C. 453, 313 S.E.2d 316, 318-319 (Ct.App.1984) ().
Nevertheless, there is substantial authority for our holding....
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Grp. III Mgmt., Inc. v. Suncrete of Carolina, Inc.
-
In re Bleam
...of Arrow's claim. Plaintiff claims that Defendants may incur criminal liability under the construction lien statute and State v. Hill, 286 S.C. 283, 333 S.E.2d 789 (1985). The State's interest in prosecution of crimes for fraudulent failure to pay is distinguished from collection of debt co......
-
State v. Whitesides
...deference as a jury's findings of fact and will not be disturbed unless no evidence reasonably supports them. State v. Hill, 286 S.C. 283, 284, 333 S.E.2d 789, 790 (Ct.App.1985). The trial court's finding was based on a witness's statement that was admitted into evidence. Thus, evidence in ......
-
Waldo v. Cousins
... ... confirmed."). We find the Policy of the South Carolina ... REALTORS Governing State Professional Standards Procedures ... (the S.C. Policy) did not require a more detailed order. The ... S.C. Policy's direction for ... ...