State v. Hill
| Decision Date | 01 July 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 54513,54513 |
| Citation | 297 So.2d 660 |
| Parties | STATE of Louisiana v. William HILL, III. |
| Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
Murphy W. Bell, Director, Woodson T. Callihan, Jr., Trial Atty., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.
Willaim J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie Brown, Dist. Atty., Ralph L. Roy, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert G. Pugh, Shreveport, for amicus curiae.
This is a murder prosecution. The Grand Jury of East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, indicted William Hill, III, for first degree murder of Tracy M. Lathers, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30, paragraph 4, applying to a homicide in which the offender 'has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm upon more than one person.' Under the statute, as amended by Act 109 of 1973, the crime of first degree murder is punished by death.
Hill filed a motion to quash the indictment on two grounds:
(1) The death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution; and
(2) The statute is unconstitutional, because the jury is empowered to return a responsive verdict of second degree murder or manslaughter, which does not carry a death penalty.
The defendant relied upon the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972).
The trial judge sustained the motion to quash, being of the opinion that the power to return responsive verdicts of lesser included non-capital crimes rendered the statute unconstitutional under the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Furman v. Georgia, supra. The State appealed.
All contentions in defendant's motion have been answered adversely to him in our recent decision in State v. Selman, La., 300 So.2d 467 (). There, we held that the death penalty for aggravated rape was constitutional, rejecting defendant's attack on the same grounds alleged here.
The present statute, LSA-R.S. 14:30, reads as follows:
'First degree murder is the killing of a human being:
'(4) When the offender has a specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm upon more than one person,
'Whoever commits the crime of first degree murder shall be punished by death.'
The death penalty for murder, when the perpetrator has the intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm on more than one person, is nether barbarous nor disproportionate to the offense. See State v. Selman, supra; State v. Crook, 253 La 961, 221 So.2d 473 (1969); 21 Am.Jur.2d, Criminal Law, § 613, p. 563. In fact, the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution sanctions the death penalty when it is imposed with due process of law.
We conclude, therefore, that capital punishment Per se is not constitutionally proscribed.
The defendant contends, however, and the trial court agreed, that the power of the jury to return responsive verdicts for lesser included non-capital offenses renders the statute unconstitutional. We disagree.
As provided in the statute, the death penalty is mandatory for first degree murder. Article 817 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended by Act 125 of 1973, prohibits a qualification of the guilty verdict. If the defendant is found guilty as charged, the trial judge must impose the death penalty. The penalty cannot be applied in a discriminatory manner. See Furman v. Georgia, supra; State v. Holmes, 263 La. 685, 269 So.2d 207 (1972). It is true that Article 814, as amended by Act 126 of 1973, lists as responsive verdicts second degree murder, carrying a sentence of life imprisonment, and manslaughter, carrying a sentence of imprisonment up to 21 years. See LSA-R.S. 14:30.1; LSA-R.S. 14:31. The use of these lesser verdicts, however, is contingent upon the jury finding insufficient evidence to convict the defendant of first degree murder, with which he is charged. The jury is concerned only with guilt. It has no sentencing function. LSA-La.Const. Art. 19, Sec. 9 (1921); LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 802.
In State v. Selman, supra, we stated:
We hold, therefore, that the death penalty for first degree murder in LSA-R.S. 14:30 contains no constitutional infirmity.
For the reasons assigned, the ruling of the trial judge sustaining the motion to quash the indictment is reversed, the indictment is maintained, and the case is remanded to the Nineteenth Judicial...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Roberts v. Louisiana 30 31, 1976
... 428 U.S. 325 . 96 S.Ct. 3001 . 49 L.Ed.2d 974 . Stanislaus ROBERTS, Petitioner, . v. . State of LOUISIANA. . No. 75-5844. . Argued March 30-31, 1976. . Decided July 2, 1976. . Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1976. . ...P. 336. . Anthony G. Amsterdam, Stanford, Cal., for petitioners. . John L. Hill, Austin, Tex., for the State of Texas. . James L. Babin, Lake Charles, La., for the State of Louisiana. . ......
-
Williams v. State
....... Officer, Ron McKinney of the Oklahoma City Police Department identified State's Exhibit No. 4 as the gun delivered to him by William Embery on the afternoon of October 30, 1973, and which he shortly thereafter released to John Hill, a lab technician with the the Police Department. . Officer John G. Hill of the Oklahoma City Police Department identified State's Exhibit No. 4 as the gun he had received from Officer McKinney on October 30, 1973. After processing the gun and determining the registered owner to ......
-
State ex rel. Serna v. Hodges
...... See State v. Jarrette, 284 N.C. 625, 202 S.E.2d 721 (1974). The same conclusion was reached as to statutes imposing mandatory death sentences for specific enumerated crimes in State v. Sheppard, 331 A.2d 142 (Dela.1974), State v. Hill, 297 So.2d 660 (La.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090, 95 S.Ct. 682, 42 L.Ed.2d 683 (1975), Williams v. State, 542 P.2d 554 (Okla.Crim.App.1975), and Jefferson v. Commonwealth, 214 Va. 747, 204 S.E.2d 258 (1974). A statute requiring a finding of fact after conviction was upheld in Jurek v. State, ......
-
State v. Sneed
......Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972). . The constitutionality of the death penalty prescribed in Section 30 of Title 14 of the Revised Statutes has been upheld in State v. Hill, 297 So.2d 660 (La.1974), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090, 95 S.Ct. 682, 42 L.Ed.2d 683 (1975), a decision made in the light of the holding of Furman v. Georgia. We adhere to that decision. . Assignment No. 69 . A motion for a new trial was filed by defendants in which the errors ......