State v. Hoeber, WD 72448.
| Decision Date | 17 May 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. WD 72448.,WD 72448. |
| Citation | 341 S.W.3d 195 |
| Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent,v.Edward L. HOEBER, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREAppeal from the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, Daniel Fred Kellogg, Judge.Matthew Ward, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.John M. Reeves, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.Before: VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.
ORDER
Mr. Edward Hoeber appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, after a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress testimony concerning his self-incriminating statements.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Hoeber v. State
...on Mr. 488 S.W.3d 653 Hoeber's behalf at the sentencing hearing. Mr. Hoeber's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Hoeber, 341 S.W.3d 195 (Mo.App.2011).On March 24, 2010, Mr. Hoeber filed his pro se motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. In his amended Rule ......
-
Tolbert v. Auto. Finance Corp..
... ... any civil action or proceeding, or for a penalty or forfeiture given by any statute of this state, when the sum demanded, exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed twenty-five thousand ... ...