State v. Hottle

Decision Date19 January 1904
Citation78 S.W. 311,104 Mo. App. 34
PartiesSTATE v. HOTTLE.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clark County; E. R. McKee, Judge.

William Hottle was convicted of permitting the drinking of intoxicating liquors in his drug store, and he appeals. Reversed.

J. A. Whiteside, for appellant. W. T. Rutherford, for the State.

BLAND, P. J.

The defendant, a proprietor of a drug store, was convicted of a violation of section 3051, Rev. St. 1899, for permitting the drinking of intoxicating liquors in his place of business. From this conviction he appealed. It is contended by appellant that there was no proof of the venue. The evidence showed that Dr. J. W. Peckstein was a registered pharmacist in Clark county; that he resided in Wyaconda, and had his office in the same building in which the defendant kept a drug store; and that he was the owner of the building. Witness Speer testified that he lived in Wyaconda, and that he had drunk beer in the back room of defendant's drug store. On this evidence it reasonably appears that defendant's drug store was kept in Wyaconda; but it nowhere appears that Wyaconda, if a town or village, is in Clark county or in this state. Such evidence is insufficient to establish the venue. State v. King, 111 Mo. 576, 20 S. W. 299, and cases cited.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

REYBURN and GOODE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Cobb
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 13, 1949
  • State v. Alford
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 4, 1910
    ... ... 269; State v ... Schieneman, 64 Mo. 386. (2) This failure to prove the ... venue is necessarily fatal to the prosecution, and calls for ... a reversal of the case. State v. Quaite, 20 Mo.App ... 405; State v. Hopper, 21 Mo.App. 510; State v ... Schuerman, 70 Mo.App. 518; State v. Hottle, 104 ... Mo.App. 34; State v. Hughes, 71 Mo. 633; State ... v. McGrath, 73 Mo. 181; State v. McGinnis, 74 ... Mo. 245; State v. Hartnett, 75 Mo. 251; State v ... Burgess, 75 Mo. 541 ...          J. D ... Brooks for respondent ...           ...           [142 ... ...
  • State v. Alford
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 4, 1910
    ...v. Bush, 136 Mo. App. 608, 118 S. W. 670; State v. Kindrick, 21 Mo. App. 507; State v. King, 111 Mo. 576, 20 S. W. 299; State v. Hottle, 104 Mo. App. 34, 78 S. W. 311. The failure to prove venue does not mean that the defendants are entitled to a discharge, as this was undoubtedly an oversi......
  • State v. Hottle
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 19, 1904
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT