State v. Houston
Decision Date | 09 March 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 2,No. 54771,54771,2 |
Citation | 451 S.W.2d 37 |
Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gerald Gene HOUSTON, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Thomas L. Patten, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Samuel T. Vandover, Clayton, for appellant.
PRITCHARD, Commissioner.
By the verdict of a jury appellant was found guilty of robbery in the first degree by force and violence. A previous felony conviction having been alleged and found, appellant as a second offender was sentenced to ten years imprisonment in the Department of Corrections.
The first issue presented is whether appellant was entitled, under the evidence, to have the jury instructed upon the lesser offense of stealing from a person.
On the night of April 26, 1968, around nine o'clock, Nellie Hampton was on her way to her home from the City Hall of Kinloch, Missouri. She had her purse with her. On Carson Road there were two boys behind her, 'and as I turned off Carson Road they grabbed me and taken my purse.' Before Nellie got across Lurch Street she noticed someone was behind her talking. ' The other person had on a dark coat, and was shorter than the person who had on the loud jacket. The two went back to Scudder and when Nellie got back there she met Eddie Lang and told him the two boys bothered her and had her purse. Lang looked for them on Winton but did not see them. Nellie went down to the police station later that night and there saw appellant wearing a same or similar loud shirt and a blue jacket as she had seen on the person who took her purse. The purse was recovered by Nellie through Lang the following Saturday. The straps on the purse had not been broken at the time it was snatched, but were broken when she recovered it.
Eddie Lang was also headed to his home from his business on the night of April 26. On the way he " '' Lang could not describe the two by their faces, but described their clothing: 'One had on a brown coat and the other had on a blue coat.' One was taller than the other; one was short. Lang turned his car around, drove around in the area, and finally onto Granberry where he saw the two fellows. He recognized the two and told them he saw them take the lady's purse. 'I told them to give it back, then I grabbed the pocketbook.' He pointed out appellant in court as being one of the individuals he saw going through the pocketbook. Lang got out of his car and began to talk to the two, and then walked back and picked up the papers which were thrown on the same side of the street the two men were on. Lang had known appellant and his companion (Lee) since they were small, somewhere since they were seven or eight years old. He knew their families, and was on good, friendly terms with them. He had known appellant longer than Lee, who went by his last name.
In testifying in his own behalf appellant denied that he was involved in the 'purse snatching' incident with Nellie Hampton, and testified further that he was at another place gambling with friends at the time the alleged robbery took place. An alibi instruction was given by the court. Appellant argues that the evidence adduced by the state required the court to give an instruction (stealing from the person) as a part of the law of the case as would be true under his cited case, State v. Herron, Mo., 349 S.W.2d 936.
In 77 C.J.S. Robbery § 17, p. 460, it is said, See also 46 Am.Jur. Robbery, § 21, p. 149; and annotations on the distinctions between robbery accomplished by force or violence and mere stealing as by purse snatching: 57 L.R.A. 437; 46 L.R.A.,N.S., 1149; and L.R.A.1918E, 938.
The precise contention appellant makes was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Jones
...459, 464--467, 217 N.E.2d 422; Shinn v. State, 64 Ind. 13, 17--18; State v. Adams, 406 S.W.2d 608, 610--611 (Mo.); State v. Houston, 451 S.W.2d 37, 39 (Mo.); State v. Trexler, 2 Car. Law Rep. 90, 93--95 (N.C.); Marks v. State, 69 Okl.Cr. 330, 338--340, 102 P.2d 955, and cases discussed ther......
-
State v. Wilborn
...or in detaching the article taken where it is fastened in some way to the clothing or person of the one robbed.' See also State v. Houston, 451 S.W.2d 37 (Mo.1974), and the annotation at 42 A.L.R.3d 1381. In the 'snatching with force' cases the accused takes hold of the object but does not ......
-
State v. Blewett
...324 S.W.2d 717 (Mo.1959); State v. Herron, 349 S.W.2d 936 (Mo.1961); State v. Sawyer, 365 S.W.2d 487, l.c. 492 (Mo.1963); State v. Houston, 451 S.W.2d 37 (Mo.1970); State v. Tidwell, 500 S.W.2d 329, 332 (Mo.App.1973). A typical holding in this line of cases appears in the Sawyer 'The State'......
-
United States v. Ash, s. 17-3223 & 17-3245
...the article is merely snatched from the hand of another the offense is stealing and not robbery. Id. at 611 ; see also State v. Houston, 451 S.W.2d 37, 39 (Mo. 1970) (noting "there was actual violence in excess of mere snatching"); State v. White, 326 Mo. 1000, 34 S.W.2d 79 (1930) ("The mer......