State v. Huffman

Decision Date19 September 2007
Docket NumberNo. 2006-0799.,2006-0799.
Citation872 N.E.2d 1213,114 Ohio St.3d 433,2007 Ohio 4553
PartiesThe STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. HUFFMAN, Appellant.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and James Michael Keeling, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Ravert J. Clark, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed with respect to the issues presented in Proposition of Law Nos. I and II on the authority of State v. Tooley, 114 Ohio St.3d 366, 2007-Ohio-3698, 872 N.E.2d 894.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. III, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Huffman v. Brunsman
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • 14 Noviembre 2008
    ...Appeals as to the first two propositions of law and dismissed the third as having been improvidently granted. See State v. Huffman, 114 Ohio St.3d 433, 872 N.E.2d 1213 (2007). While the above appeals were pending, on August 1, 2005, Petitioner filed a motion for post-conviction relief under......
  • State v. Clark
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 30 Octubre 2008
    ...omitted)); State v. Huffman, 165 Ohio App.3d 518, 847 N.E.2d 58, 69 (2006), aff'd in part and appeal dismissed in part, 114 Ohio St.3d 433, 872 N.E.2d 1213 (2007) (state is not required to present any additional evidence to demonstrate images depict real children); McIntyre v. State, 168 Md......
  • In re Ohio Domestic-Violence Statute Cases
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 19 Septiembre 2007
    ... ... State v. Carswell, 114 Ohio St.3d 210, 2007-Ohio-3723, 871 N.E.2d 547 ...         MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL and ... ...
  • Heskett v. Ohio Department of Administrative Services
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 19 Septiembre 2007

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT