State v. Hunsaker

Citation933 P.2d 415
Decision Date21 February 1997
Docket NumberNo. 960234-CA,960234-CA
Parties311 Utah Adv. Rep. 18 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Vao Boyd HUNSAKER, Defendant and Appellant.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Utah

Michael D. Bouwhuis, Ogden, for Appellant.

Jan Graham, Attorney General, and Kris C. Leonard, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Appeals Division, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before DAVIS, P.J., WILKINS, Associate P.J., and GREENWOOD, J.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals the trial court's judgment and order on his plea in abeyance agreement. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

A plea in abeyance is defined as

an order by a court, upon motion of the prosecution and the defendant, accepting a plea of guilty or of no contest from the defendant but not, at that time, entering judgment of conviction against him nor imposing sentence upon him on condition that he comply with specific conditions as set forth in a plea in abeyance agreement.

Utah Code Ann. § 77-2a-1(1) (1995) (emphasis added). In criminal cases, the sentence itself is the final judgment from which an appeal can be taken. State v. Gerrard, 584 P.2d 885, 886 (Utah 1978). Because defendant has not been sentenced, the appeal was not taken from a final order, and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Further, this court recently stated that the plain language of section 77-2a-1 "reveals that a plea in abeyance is not a final adjudication." State v. Moss, 921 P.2d 1021, 1025 n. 7 (Utah.Ct.App.1996).

Appeal dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Comer
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • June 27, 2002
    ...there has been no final judgment, a direct appeal cannot be taken from a plea in abeyance agreement. See State v. Hunsaker, 933 P.2d 415, 416 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (per curiam); State v. Moss, 921 P.2d 1021, 1025 n. 7 (Utah Ct.App.1996). "In criminal cases, the sentence itself is the final jud......
  • State v. Mooers
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • November 5, 2015
    ...a conviction, to that crime" for the purpose of making an individual ineligible for unemployment benefits); State v. Hunsaker, 933 P.2d 415, 416 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (per curiam) (dismissing an appeal from a trial court's order regarding a plea in abeyance agreement for lack of jurisdiction f......
  • State v. Walker
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • September 12, 2002
    ...Thus, prior statements made from the bench are not the judgment of the case and, therefore, are not appealable."); State v. Hunsaker, 933 P.2d 415, 416 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (holding a plea in abeyance is not a final order in part because the defendant had not been 8. We note that the trial co......
  • State v. Millward
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 2014
    ...be taken from a plea in abeyance agreement.” State v. Comer, 2002 UT App 219, ¶ 14, 51 P.3d 55; see also State v. Hunsaker, 933 P.2d 415, 416 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (per curiam); State v. Moss, 921 P.2d 1021, 1025 n. 7 (Utah Ct.App.1996). Thus, under well-settled law, Millward is not guaranteed......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT