State v. International & G. N. R. Co.
Decision Date | 25 May 1896 |
Parties | STATE v. INTERNATIONAL & G. N. R. CO. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
C. A. Culberson, Atty. Gen., and Frank Andrews, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant. John M. Duncan, Alex. G. Cochran, W. S. Pierce, T. N. Jones. R. G. Street, and Douglas & Jackson, for appellee.
In this cause the court of civil appeals have certified to this court a question and explanatory statement as follows:
If the district or county attorney had authority to institute the proceeding in question, it must be found in the following statute: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial22 cases
-
Meshell v. State
...and lodge the exclusive duty to prosecute such suits in the office of the Attorney General. Brady, supra. See State v. International & G.N.R. Co., 89 Tex. 562, 35 S.W. 1067 (1896). This apparent encroachment upon the power of district and county attorneys was permissible because an express ......
-
State of Texas v. Continental Distilling Sales Co.
...DeSilva, 105 Tex. 95, 145 S.W. 330; Federal Communications Com. v. Sanders, 309 U.S. 470, 60 S.Ct. 693, 84 L.Ed. 869; State v. International R., 89 Tex. 562, 35 S.W. 1067; Security State Bank v. State, Tex. Civ.App., 169 S.W.2d 554; State of Missouri v. Homesteaders, 8 Cir., 90 F.2d 543; Re......
- Fannin-Lamar-Delta Improvement Dist. No. 3 v. State
-
American Liberty Pipe Line Co. v. Agey
...we shall briefly review, stated chronologically are: State v. Paris Ry. Co., 55 Tex. 76; State v. Moore, 57 Tex. 307; State v. I. & G. N., 89 Tex. 562, 35 S.W. 1067; Maud v. Terrell, 109 Tex. 97, 200 S.W. 375; Staples v. State, 112 Tex. 61, 245 S.W. 639; Allen v. Fisher, 118 Tex. 38, 9 S.W.......
Request a trial to view additional results